> My criteria for choosing full thickness Delignit is that as a high end woodworker, > I have been responsible for chopping up way more old growth lumber than I would have liked. > Not only that, but quarter sawn lumber is a really inefficient use of the logs board footage. > If there is no other choice I will relunctantly use the old growth, but when, as in the case of > Delignit, an engineered substance exists, I really would prefer to use it instead. Be advised then, that the multilam maple blocks are rotary cut. > Yes, its unforgiving. That's why I've tried to design a drilling process that resembles more > what a machinist would do, rather than what a woodworker would do. Likewise, and doing the composite of both gives the firm support of Delignit at the top, and the forgiveness of the multilam underneath. I think it's considerably better than either alone. > Its also why I chose not to drill in the piano, which from all other angles is more efficient than > drilling on the bench. > > Jim I You lost me there. Explain please? Ron N
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC