A key passage from Wogram (below) relating to the effect of effect of the resonant frequencies of the soundboard. How the positioning and size/mass/stiffness of the cutoff bar would affect a given panels resonant frequencies in general I am not sure of. Cheers RicB > "No uniform relation was found between the successive stages of > reduction of the rib height and the changes in the input impedance. > The influence of the first reduction (from 100 to 75% rib height) was > considerably less than that of the second (from 75 to 50%). The > influence seems to be greater once the basic stiffening has been > removed and there is no longer any compensation for the anisotropism > in the moduli of elasticity. > > Turning to the sound radiation, the same effects were observed as for > the impedance; the lower resonant frequencies are shifted downwards > and sound radiation is reduced. However, unlike the effect on the > impedance, the reduction in sound radiation extends over the entire > frequency range, even above 500 Hz. This is due to a short-circuiting > phenomenon, as mentioned in the introduction. Above a certain > frequency, the soundboard no longer vibrates as a unit but divides > into a number of vibrating areas, which results in a poorer radiation > efficiency. In addition, the lack of compensation for the anisotropism > causes a reduction in the total vibrating area and hence a poorer > radiation. > > From the measurements it can be concluded that the two most important > functions of the ribs are to stiffen the soundboard and to compensate > for the differences in bending stiffness parallel to and across the > grain (anisotropism). The bending stiffness exerts a greater influence > than the mass. For this reason it is more advantageous to use narrow, > high ribs than ribs with a low and wide section." >
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC