[pianotech] Collodion vs Lacquer for hammer hardening

John Delacour JD at Pianomaker.co.uk
Sun Dec 7 15:11:53 PST 2008


At 14:27 -0800 7/12/08, Jurgen Goering wrote:

>In Europe, one traditional hammer hardening solution is collodion.
>
>My question: What is the difference between collodion and 
>nitrocellulose lacquer?...

Well, if you're talking of the sort of nitrocellulose lacquer that is 
used by some people for wood finishing etc. then the main difference 
might be the solvent (cellulose thinners), which is much slower to 
evaporate than ether or acetone.  I've never tried ether because it's 
not so easy to get hold of here, but to make a hammer dope I dissolve 
old celluloid key-tops in acetone, and I think quite a few people do 
the same.  The faster the dope hardens the better it is, so that the 
result can be more quickly assessed.  As the solvents evaporate the 
cellulose draws together and so has the effect, in theory, of 
tightening the fibres of the felt as well as replacing air with solid 
cellulose.  The same sort of collodion product is used by make-up 
artists to simulate wrinkles and scars, an effect you can see if you 
paint some on your face and let it dry.  I'm not sure whether 
nitro-cellulose lacquer has the tenacity to do the same.

JD




More information about the pianotech mailing list

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC