Wow, JF. Nice rant. Really. Sounds like me. <g> 100% correct. Duaine, Duaine, Duaine. You are revealing everything in your posts, and in what Ed Sutton discovered. I suggest you put quotation marks around the word "tune" or "tuning" whenever you reference your own work. You are not a piano tuner in any world I recognize. You are a wrench turner; a dial-looker, brother...not a tuner. I'm proud to be a piano tuner. It's a lovely, challenging, difficult skill. It's worth a life of effort. If you don't know why I certainly cannot tell you why, but I'll give you a hint: "Character is destiny." Heraclitus Rock on.... DA On Dec 18, 2008, at 4:58 AM, John Formsma wrote: > RPT is minimal competency. If you cannot tell -- and be able to > explain -- the difference in what constitutes a good tuning, then > you don't deserve the minimal competency credentials. You wouldn't > expect a bookkeeper to promote himself "as good as a CPA" unless he > had passed some sort of competency exam, right? Or a paralegal to > offer his services as a lawyer unless he'd been to law school and > passed the bar exams, right? > > Duaine, when I began tuning, I used a SAT II, and couldn't tell the > difference in much other than unisons. Maybe if the octaves were > really bad. But I joined PTG, got the help of an RPT mentor, and > persisted. It was really hard for me to mentally grasp the concepts > of regulation. But I persisted. I passed the exams. And I'm not > particularly proud of my personal performance on the technical > exams, because I know I can do better out in the "real world." But > I persisted, and got it done. And now, I'm still trying to improve > my skills. I'm still persisting. > > I have a magnetic sticker on my fridge with a quote by Henry Ford: > "Whether you think you can, or think you can't, you're right." The > thing that is holding you back is you: it is not test standards or > other techs … it's just you. So if you want to have the RPT > credentials, quit griping and whining, and figure out how to get it > done. All the rest of us have done it, and you can too. But you're > not going to do it if you keep saying "I can't." > > -- > JF > > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:11 PM, Duaine & Laura Hechler <dahechler at charter.net > > wrote: > So, what you are saying that if I can't tune aurally then I should not > be tuning at all. > > If that's the case, you are about to start a major war between each > tuner's opinion. > > Again, you mention peers, sure most of my peers in this area have > tuned > aurally - to pass the test - but they have all switched to tuning with > some form of ETD. > > Again, you mention clients - I don't know where you are and who you > tune > for BUT none of my clients have EVER asked if I could tune aurally. > > This argument is getting so &*&^% old !!!! > > Duaine > > William Monroe wrote: > > No Duaine, > > > > People like you should be excluded from RPT precisely because (your > > description, mind you) you can't tune aurally and have no > > understanding of the basic tuning concepts e.g. intervals, beats, > > checks, etc. RPT is a designation that is defined in part by > > affirming to ones peers, clients, etc that one can tune aurally - at > > least to some measured degree, even with an ETD. > <snip> > > > > Good luck in your growth. > > > > William R. Monroe > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/pianotech_ptg.org/attachments/20081218/ad0856d1/attachment.html>
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC