Mark-up (was Steinway parts)

[David Ilvedson]

I see I missed the "current contracts" language...



David Ilvedson, RPT

Pacifica, CA 94044









Original message

From: Farrell 

To: "Pianotech List" 

Received: 2/20/2008 12:35:36 PM

Subject: Re: Mark-up (was Steinway parts)





I do the same thing Paul.



Terry Farrell

----- Original Message ----- 

Journal February and March 2005. And that was the wrong number--closer to 30 hours. And what can't you understand about not costing a newly discovered but necessary procedure into an already signed agreement. 



Paul











-----Original Message-----



can't figure out your example about the agraffes,  



"For example, we began to work with agraffes differently many years ago which added about 60 hours into our jobs but which did not get costed into the then current contracts. We wanted to do it, we couldn't in conscience not do it knowing the good results we were getting, so we took the hit for a while. "  

if you mean you were experimenting with an agraffe procedure, I can understand not adding it to the bill...sort of/not really...but eating an extra 60 hours?   what the heck were you doing to the agraffes?   making them?...;-]   



David Ilvedson, RPT
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/20080220/26122620/attachment.html