I’m all ears. Please explain the physics as you know it that would account for this. David Love www.davidlovepianos.com From: pianotech-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf Of PAULREVENKOJONES at aol.com Sent: Friday, August 28, 2009 2:25 PM To: pianotech at ptg.org Subject: Re: [pianotech] PR follow up The language issue, the lack of clear terms as I asked you, is not addressed. And while I can't bring a crowd along with me to prove a point, my experience is different from yours, as is, apparently, my understanding of the physics of the piano. Perhaps neither of us is wrong but that there is a truth in the middle? Let's not get polarized here. It's why asked if I was missing your point rather than say you were incorrect. Cheers, Paul In a message dated 8/28/2009 3:31:36 P.M. Central Daylight Time, davidlovepianos at comcast.net writes: I don’t know if you’re missing the point I just think you are incorrect. It’s an interesting claim but it flies in the face of my experience, and others it would seem. The stability of a fine tuning is easily measurable so show me the research and data that support that there is no way to fine tune a piano that has been radically pitch altered—even after 10 passes. David Love www.davidlovepianos.com _____ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/pianotech.php/attachments/20090828/3ab4bf30/attachment.htm>
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC