[pianotech] PR follow up

David Love davidlovepianos at comcast.net
Fri Aug 28 20:55:30 MDT 2009


I meant can’t achieve immediate stability after a radical pitch change.  I thought that was what we were talking about.  Damn that language thing again.  

 

David Love

www.davidlovepianos.com

 

From: pianotech-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf Of PAULREVENKOJONES at aol.com
Sent: Friday, August 28, 2009 5:55 PM
To: pianotech at ptg.org
Subject: Re: [pianotech] PR follow up

 

 

 

In a message dated 8/28/2009 7:49:28 P.M. Central Daylight Time, davidlovepianos at comcast.net writes:

I don’t think they offer a reason that the piano can’t achieve stability.  

David: 

 

I have never said in any word I've written that the piano can't achieve stability, or some modicum of it. I have only questioned how much stability, and what level of claim are we going to make after a radical pitch alteration to a level of stability which may or may not be defined as adequate, acceptable, or fine. Sheesh.

 

Cheers,

 

P

 

 

  _____  

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/pianotech.php/attachments/20090828/761acb32/attachment.htm>


More information about the pianotech mailing list

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC