Gene Nelson wrote: > ****In regard to the half meter rib: Given a radius of 12 meters and > chord of .47 meter the calculator predicts 2.1mm of crown or segment > height. I get 2.3, but that's close enough. > If the center of load support (high point and thickest part) is > asymmetricly shifted off center of the chord, the calc cannot be > accurate and their will always be less crown than desired? Still a bit > confused. > Gene One more time. You will NOT, under any circumstances, WHATEVER you may do or think you're doing, move the high point to anywhere other than the center of the rib in a constant radius crown. Forget the high point, please. Moving the center of load will NOT effect the high point of the unloaded crown in ANY manner. It will slightly affect the bridge height, when the point of load isn't on the center, but you'll be quite a ways off center before that is a real problem. Look up the math for height of an arc segment at any position on the chord to find it. You'll find it's not very useful in practice. For instance, locating the bridge at 200mm, or 33mm off center, the height is 0.05mm lower. At 150mm, or 85mm off center, the height difference is 0.3mm. That's a closer tolerance than you'll likely be able to build to. Also. There is a definite gap between what is theoretically absolute, and what in practice disappears in the background noise. Part of what you're doing with redesign is roughly defining that gap for yourself and your methods, against your expectation and results. Just like everything else you've ever done in, on, or to a piano. Ron N
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC