Exactly. Brian: sometimes it pays to reread things that tick you off; Jude, a Gølden-Rule-living human being, meant you no harm whatsoever. Cool down, sporty.... David A. On Jun 28, 2009, at 8:19 AM, Ruth Phillips wrote: > Brian, > Regarding your response to Jude Revely's comments, I did not read it > as an > attack > on you, but as saying "out of your expected scope" as one called in > for > tuning, not > to hang new hammers. In other words, he did not say "out of your > expected > abilities". > There was no implication of inadequacy on your part. > Ruth Phillips > ruth at alliedpiano.com > > >> Brian, > > FWIW I don't read Ron's post to have anything to do with the tuning > as it > arrived. We all know concert tuners are dealing with piano trench > warfare. I > read Ron's comments as more to do with the manufacturing end. The > tenor > tuning problems refer to the scaling problem which I believe was quite > relevant to the thread, and the regulation and hammer hanging also > seems out > of your expected scope. > > Best, > > Jude Reveley, RPT > Absolute Piano Restoration, LLC > www.absolute-piano.com > > > > >> Jude > Well you have caught me out. Yes, I am only a part time technician > who needs > more training to understand the basics of piano technology. I thought > levelling keys had nothing to do with scaling of a piano. Now where > do I > find the book that tells me where to rescale a B model whilst > discussing key > levelling. > The regulation and hammer hanging being out of my expected scope. > Thank you > for lowering yourself to an insult over your opinion of my work. >
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC