Bernard: "Over more than 6 years you have argumented that my work is predated by the work of others, whithout presenting any proof." I dont think we need to rehash this same point again. I have never said that your "exact" work is predated by others. Quite the opposite, just recently on CAUT http://ptg.org/pipermail/caut_ptg.org/2008-October/027991.html I will not, however accept being accused of consciously stealing yours or anyone else's ideas. I have responded to that by stating there is prior knowledge that is significantly close enough to the general subject matter to show where my own influences have come from. And I have supplied ample more then ample evidence to that affect. And my reasons for posting said information has only to do clearing up that point. I did not claim Gary Shulze wrote anything specifically about the 19th root of three, in fact I stated exactly that he did not but that I'd spotted that in another early column See: http://ptg.org/pipermail/caut_ptg.org/2008-October/028020.html (second to the last paragraph) If I have to... well I'll dig up that other column as well. But really... this should be unnecessary. What is the point ? Why not leave all this behind us and simply enjoy discussing the subject matter we both share so much interest in ? I see no threat to your software or claims of authenticity here. Cheers RicB
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC