[pianotech] high leverage action

Gene Nelson nelsong at intune88.com
Fri Mar 13 16:51:41 PDT 2009



> Hmmm... I think we'll have to be a bit more specific then that.  A 10 gram 
> strike weight in the top low strike weight zone equates to something 
> around hammer number 5.  A weight of 5 at key 88 is perhaps a quarter zone 
> higher... that means you have really low hammer weight if this is 
> reflective.
***** I will probably push the hammers up to number 6. As I said, I have not 
done any corrective hammer leading yet.

 Front weights... assuming we are balancing the
> same  notes you mentioned for hammer weights then you have an action ratio 
> of 6.2 in the bass ranging to 7.8 in the treble.  Kind of wild... but 
> suffice to say you have a high action ratio... which fits at least your KR 
> and Knuckle configuration.  Without more specifics this is just ball park. 
> I'd ask for  at least 7-8 samples of SW, FW, BW, and KR along with your WW 
> to get a more accurate picture of your situation...  say all C's but  I 
> think its safe to say you have a pretty high action ratio....no matter 
> which way you look at it.

******My samples were not all C's but they are all naturals, first and last 
in each section. - here it is:
note#    SW    FW    BW    KR    WW
1          10      30.1    41.5  .55     16.4
25        10      26.7   42.5   .52     16.4
27        9.3     23.8   39.5   .54     16.4
45       8.4     15.5    44      .54     16.4
47       8.7     16.6    42.5   .53     16.4
66      6.8      7.7      42.5   .54     16.4
68      6.5      6.5      41.5   .54     16.4
88      5.0      6.8      36.5   .53     16.4
Note that the WW value is the same because it is the average - the range was 
from 15.9 to 17.2

>
> Why you end up with such a short blow distance and deep key dip to get any 
> aftertouch is a good question if the above is close to the truth of the 
> matter.  A short bore length would force you to raise the shank closer to 
> the strings... ie raise the underlever (whippen) which should not require 
> a deep key dip to get aftertouch. A long one would keep your shank just 
> off the rest cushion at a shorter blow distance... and perhaps fit the 
> condition of a high action ratio thats heavy, has keep key dip and short 
> blow with minimum aftertouch. But if you are certain about bore length 
> being at String height - hammer shank center height then something is not 
> quite right with this whole picture.... grin.. or its just so late over 
> here that I've got things backasswards again.... wouldnt be the first 
> time. :)
****I am absolutely certain that the bore distances are based on String 
height - hammer shank center height.
>
> As far as minimum 44 mm.  I think thats about as short a blow as you can 
> allow for without sacrificing too much power.  Usually you find somewhere 
> between 45 and 49... sometimes 44... sometimes 50.... rarely outside that 
> because of what implications it has for the rest of action regulation 
> specs.  We have this ideal of about 10 mm key dip, and about 1.5 to 2.5 mm 
> letoff... which more or less dictates blow for any given amount of 
> aftertouch.  It all adds up usually to somewhere between 44 and 50 for 
> blow.
**** I measured the height of the sharp blocks to get an idea of maximum key 
dip. Not that I like that much necessarily.

Gene

>
> Cheers
> RicB
>
>
>> >/ What are your Hammer Strike weights
>> /*****10 in the bass and 5 in the treble - no corrective weighting action 
>> taken yet.
>>
>>  and key Front Weights ?
>> *****
>> 30 in the bass and 6.8 in the treble
>>
>>  Your dip
>> >/ and blow say low ratio but your KR and knuckle distance says high. How
>> />/ much aftertouch are you getting with things as they are...
>> /***** about 1.5mm or slightly less.
>>
>>  how far out
>> >/ from under the knuckle does the jack move ?
>> /*****Just enough for drop and aftertouch to happen.
>> >/
>> />/ 41 mm is on the short end of the stick to be sure.  I usually dont 
>> see />/ under 44 and never allow for less when redoing an action.
>> /***** Do you have a reason for maintaining 44mm or greater blow 
>> distance?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Gene
>> >/
>> />/ Cheers
>> />/ RicB
>> />/
>> />/
>> />/    Hello list,
>> />/    Thought that I would seek comments on an action with high 
>> leverage.
>> />/    Key dip is 10.5mm and blow distance is 41mm.
>> />/    The touchweights are in the low 50's down and low 30's up.
>> />/    Knuckle spread 16.5mm
>> />/    Key ratio is 1.81
>> />/    Action spread is 113mm and is adjustable.
>> />/    Any more dip will make the sharps about level with the naturals 
>> when
>> />/    depressed. The feel of the samples are acceptable. Seems that 41mm
>> />/    blow distance is short - but is it too short? Maybe some loss of
>> />/    power? Is there a down side to this action? Any corrective
>> />/    suggestions? It is in the sampling - disassembled stage.
>> />/    Thanks,
>> />/    Gene
>> />/
>> />/
>> />/ /
> 




More information about the pianotech mailing list

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC