I'm not sure what your responding to exactly. The goal is a uniform string height and a "slightly" graduated or even bridge height such that at the treble end it is tall enough so as not to compromise tonal output. The question was if you had to raise the string height in order to achieve that would you change the leverage. Whether you do or not seems to have entered the realm of picking nits and gotten complicated by the fact that on many pianos because of the plate characteristics it is impossible to achieve both of those goals. So, in practice, even if it does change the leverage (and I'm not convinced that it does) I don't think it changes it enough to not make the necessary plate adjustment which was really the point of my initial comment. It's all getting a bit muddled at this point. David Love www.davidlovepianos.com From: pianotech-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf Of Jon Page Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 6:46 AM To: pianotech at ptg.org Subject: Re: [pianotech] Increasing bridge height The original question was whether a change in the string height accompanying by an equal and offsetting change in the bore distance changes the action leverage. My most recent comments addressed the practical aspects of making those changes even if it does to some small degree change the leverage. The change is that it would make the shank ratio more consistent across the keyboard. Anything one can do to make measurements similar causes less variation between the registers. I don't think sacrificing an even string height for prescribed cast-in front duplex lengths optimal for regulation and questionable for the tonal benefit. -- Regards, Jon Page -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/pianotech_ptg.org/attachments/20090325/69017db2/attachment.html>
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC