[pianotech] Ethics and efficacy of part-time tuning

wimblees at aol.com wimblees at aol.com
Mon Mar 30 19:55:09 PDT 2009


Jerry

There is a difference between the government (whether it's state of federal), running a business such as ours, and having standards to follow. Plumbers, hairdressers, electricians, etc. have to be licensed to work. Although there are some who get away without being licensed, customers who do use them do so at their own risk. 

We (PTG members) complain about the shoddy workmanship of "tooners", who are allowed to rip off customers. But when we (PTG members) discuss some sort of licensing, we object. The PTG is marketing the RPT brand. But custmers can't be forced to choose us, because?there are too many highly qualified piano tuner/technicians who do not belong to the PTG.??

For those of you might not remember, the reason we developed our standardized tuning and technical exams back in the '80's is because there was a rumor going around Washington that Congress was going to 'regulate" our industry. We felt thought that?if they were going to do that, perhaps they would choose our exam system,?instead of coming up with some off the wall requirements. 


Wim

-----Original Message-----
From: Gerald Groot <tunerboy3 at comcast.net>
To: pianotech at ptg.org
Sent: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 2:47 pm
Subject: Re: [pianotech] Ethics and efficacy of part-time tuning




We have no govenmental (?) guidelines such as you state before being allowed
to attempt to pass the PTG tests which are of very high standards.  Our
government doesn't get involved with this at all which is probably a good
thing seeing as how they run everything else as poorly as they do....  

Whether we choose full or part time, we need to do the best work possible
under any given circumstance.  


-----Original Message----- 
From: pianotech-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf
Of David Boyce 
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 8:17 PM 
To: pianotech at ptg.org 
Subject: Re: [pianotech] Ethics and efficacy of part-time tuning 

"I think he's saying, if we are going to tune, whether full time or part 
time, do it right or don't do it at all.  That's how I'm reading it.   I 
also agree with that philosophy". 

I'm interested in the strong views being eloquently expressed here.  I have 
a feeling that the 'mindset' is more open in the trade in the USA than in 
the UK. There are those who take the view that if you are not full time, you

CANNOT do it right, and therefore should not be doing it at all. 

As one who's doing it part time, that's naturally not a view with which I am

particularly in sympathy! 

In the UK, the pianoforte tuners association makes the following 
stipulations regarding the possibility of Membership: 

5. To qualify for Membership of the Association an applicant must: 
either: have trained as a Pianoforte Tuner, Technician or Maker in a 
reputable factory or workshop for not less than three years, or have 
completed an approved course in Pianoforte Tuning or Technical Studies at a 
recognised College and have gained the proficiency certificate, and has 
subsequently earned a living as a Pianoforte Tuner, Technician or Maker for 
a period (at least two years) which, combined with the training period, is 
at least five years, 
or: have earned a living as a Pianoforte Tuner, Technician or Maker for at 
least seven years. 
at the time of application, currently be engaged in the 
piano industry 

and 

either: pass a practical test of tuning and elementary repairs, and an oral 
test of his knowledge of tuning, construction and repair of pianos. 
or - if applying for Technician membership - pass an assessment of practical

ability and theoretical knowledge in a specialist field of piano technology.


(from http://www.pianotuner.org.uk/pta4.htm ) 

You will notice that the wording here leaves little room for those earning 
supplementary income from piano work. Although, no actual definition is 
given of "earned a living". 

Is the membership requirement for the PTG in addition to passing the test, 
equally stringent? 

Best regards, 

David. 



  _____  

avast! Antivirus <http://www.avast.com> : Outbound message clean. 


Virus Database (VPS): 090330-0, 03/30/2009
Tested on: 3/30/2009 8:47:22 PM
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2009 ALWIL Software.





-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/pianotech_ptg.org/attachments/20090330/cd30af62/attachment.html>


More information about the pianotech mailing list

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC