In balance, I agree, but in reality, it makes no difference. The discovery of the overborne backscale was the primary problem. The lessening of the back bearing and the net lessening of overall bearing are in this instance just differing perspectives on the bearing condition as a whole. The front bearing condition may marginally change with the change in back bearing and both components need to be watched as changes are made. Has this been your experience? P In a message dated 5/27/2009 2:31:17 P.M. Central Daylight Time, rnossaman at cox.net writes: PAULREVENKOJONES at aol.com wrote: > You betcha! :-) > > > In a message dated 5/27/2009 1:59:11 P.M. Central Daylight Time, > rnossaman at cox.net writes: > > All of which also changes net bearing. So did the back bearing change you made that made the piano sound better work because of the back bearing angle change, or the net bearing change. I pick door number 2. Ron N **************We found the real ‘Hotel California’ and the ‘Seinfeld’ diner. What will you find? Explore WhereItsAt.com. (http://www.whereitsat.com/?ncid=emlwenew00000004) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/pianotech.php/attachments/20090527/73f3f958/attachment.htm>
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC