[pianotech] ETD stretch vs pure (octaves)

PAULREVENKOJONES at aol.com PAULREVENKOJONES at aol.com
Fri Nov 13 21:03:11 MST 2009


Yeah, the phrase "properly tuned octave" is the killer isn't it.
 
P
 
 
In a message dated 11/13/2009 9:59:10 P.M. Central Standard Time,  
pianotuna at accesscomm.ca writes:

Hi  Paul,

A properly tuned octave is a matter of taste. I have one client  who prefers
2:1 octaves on her entire piano. I accomodate her wishes. Of  course, all
the other partials are contracted from where most folks want to  hear them.

At 10:42 PM 11/13/2009 EST, you wrote:
>      
>
> I shouldn't but...    There is still vast confusion in the use of the
>phrases "pure octave"  and  stretch. All properly tuned octaves are 
slightly
>wider at  some coincident  partial, so stretched. You choose the  
coincident
>partial set of your liking.     I am not  familiar enough with machines to
>speak to how they treat octaves   in the midrange, but it is evident and
>calculable that as you go deeper  into the  bass and higher into the 
treble,
>the octaves stretch  more. There is no such  thing as a "pure" octave; 
there
>will  always be some coincident partial set  beating.    P  
Regards,
Don Rose, B.Mus., A.M.U.S., A.MUS., R.P.T.
Non calor sed  umor est qui nobis incommodat

mailto:pianotuna at yahoo.com     http://us.geocities.com/drpt1948/

3004 Grant Rd. REGINA, SK, S4S  5G7
306-539-0716 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/pianotech.php/attachments/20091113/2028e9ec/attachment.htm>


More information about the pianotech mailing list

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC