[pianotech] pianotech Digest, Vol 13, Issue 143

Marshall Gisondi pianotune05 at hotmail.com
Thu Nov 19 07:57:18 MST 2009


Hi Dave,

Vanda King is the only place I found a Schwanter wippen section.  Schaff as far as I can tell doesn't have them. So I wonder where she's gettting them from.  Jurgen has the damper felts I need, the three wedge bass bi chord. I'm still waiting to hear from them on their price list.  Do you guys use Schaff for string duplicating also?  thanks

Marshall

Marshall Gisondi Piano Technician
Marshall's Piano Service
pianotune05 at hotmail.com
215-510-9400
Graduate of The School of Piano Technology for the Blind www.pianotuningschool.org Vancouver, WA





 
From: pianotech-request at ptg.org
Subject: pianotech Digest, Vol 13, Issue 143
To: pianotech at ptg.org
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 06:00:45 -0700

Send pianotech mailing list submissions to
	pianotech at ptg.org
 
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	http://ptg.org/mailman/listinfo/pianotech
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	pianotech-request at ptg.org
 
You can reach the person managing the list at
	pianotech-owner at ptg.org
 
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of pianotech digest..."


--Forwarded Message Attachment--
From: erwinspiano at aol.com
To: pianotech at ptg.org; st.piano at verizon.net; ray at ronsen-hammer.com; res07key at verizon.net
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 23:48:04 -0500
Subject: [pianotech] Weickert Felt by ROnsen



  Hi All 



   Perhaps this has been discussed here since April when I took my leave of abscence. So... Just a quick comment to say that  the final development of Weickert felt has been dialed in closely By Wurzen Felt co/Jack Brand. Over the past 1 & 1/2 years Jack Brand,Ray Negron at Ronsen, myself  have worked hard at beta testing for feedback and the latest batch of felt is getting good reveiws. I've heard some very positive comments from Star Taylor, & Darrel Fandrich.  I think Starr has used them in a Stwy B and a Yamaha of some kind.



    Any body else out there with objective or subjective feedback. I'm just working up a BB Mason but I haven't heard them yet.



   Thanks



  Dale Erwin



--Forwarded Message Attachment--
From: PAULREVENKOJONES at aol.com
To: pianotech at ptg.org
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 23:57:20 -0500
Subject: Re: [pianotech] Weickert Felt by ROnsen









I'd be interested in what people are finding that they have to do to 
prepare them for any kind of fine voicing. Are there sections that needs more 
hardening/needling? If hardening, what chemicals are working best? How much? If 
needling in any general sense, where and how much? 

 

Paul

 



In a message dated 11/18/2009 10:53:56 P.M. Central Standard Time, 
erwinspiano at aol.com writes:

Any body else out there with objective or subjective 
feedback. I'm just working up a BB Mason but I haven't heard them 
yet.


--Forwarded Message Attachment--
From: bill at a440piano.net
To: pianotech at ptg.org
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:18:39 -0600
Subject: Re: [pianotech] Weickert Felt by ROnsen

Hi Dale, Paul,

Dale, as you know, we recently installed a set of Weickerts on a 9' Henry F. Miller.  Very nice hammers - the whole package.  Used acrylic/acetone in the top two octaves to bring them up to the same level as the rest of the piano.  Not much more than "break-in fluid," really.  And, honestly, less than 30 minutes needling.  Most of that time spent just checking to be sure I wasn't overlooking something.  Very little actual needling.  The acrylic/acetone worked very well in terms of bringing the tone up and matching the overall tonal palette of the other hammers.  Very warm sounding hammers.  Great fundamental, and a really penetrating sound.  "Out of the box" type of tone, and very nice.  More like a Shigeru Kawai than a Steinway it that means anything to anyone.


Client is very pleased.

William R. Monroe

  


On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 10:57 PM, <PAULREVENKOJONES at aol.com> wrote:









I'd be interested in what people are finding that they have to do to 
prepare them for any kind of fine voicing. Are there sections that needs more 
hardening/needling? If hardening, what chemicals are working best? How much? If 
needling in any general sense, where and how much? 

 

Paul


 



In a message dated 11/18/2009 10:53:56 P.M. Central Standard Time, 
erwinspiano at aol.com writes:

Any body else out there with objective or subjective 
feedback. I'm just working up a BB Mason but I haven't heard them 
yet.





--Forwarded Message Attachment--
From: da88ve at gmail.com
To: pianotech at ptg.org
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:04:51 -0700
Subject: [pianotech] regulating S&S (ex-) reproducer actions

    I'm told by an esteemed rebuilder colleague that the 
Steinway reproducer actions don't regulate quite the same as the 
"regular" actions because the longer keys change the action 
geometry.  He says he usually has to compromise something in the 
regulation for better playability.
    I regulated one (player system removed) after installing new 
hammers & shanks and can't quite get rid of bobbling hammers. 
Or, not so much bobbling as hammers not wanting to check on a 
soft blow.
    The key height is as high as it can be without interference 
from the fallboard.  The blow is about as high as it can be (1 
5/8") -- any higher and the bass hammers won't fit under the 
pinblock.  The dip was quite deep (almost 1/2") and I lessened 
it to make it closer to 7/16".
    The aftertouch is minimal.  It's there, but just barely.  I 
know some say aftertouch should be 0.4 mm, which to my mind is 
no aftertouch.
    What prevents hammers from checking on a soft blow?  Seems 
no matter how much I fool with backcheck angle and distance from 
the tail, some of them just will not check.  No, I don't think 
the rep springs are too strong.
    Also the touch is too light -- about 45 grams DW.  Vertigris 
infested the entire action, which was the main reason for 
replacing shanks.  Customer's budget couldn't afford new wippens 
or repinning all the rep levers, jacks, and wippen flanges, so I 
"zapped" them all to free them up, tefloned the knuckles, 
rebushed keys, & sprayed McLube on the keypins, since the action 
was extremely sluggish before.  But maybe all that was too much. 
I don't know how to make the touch heavier now except to repin 
all the wippen parts or install new ones, or re-balance the keys 
(move the key leads).
    --David Nereson, RPT 
 
 


--Forwarded Message Attachment--
From: da88ve at gmail.com
To: pianotech at ptg.org
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:06:09 -0700
Subject: Re: [pianotech] piano suppliers

Yes, I just encountered them online a few weeks ago.  It's Vanda 
King.  As far as I can tell, she just re-sells stuff from 
Schaff.
    --David Nereson, RPT
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Marshall Gisondi" <pianotune05 at hotmail.com>
To: <pianotech at ptg.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 8:01 AM
Subject: [pianotech] piano suppliers
 
 
 
Hi Everyone,
 
Has anyone here heard of or have any experience with a company 
called Vanda Kinds Piano Showcase?  I found some parts for an 
action I'm working on and wanted to get some feedback on them. 
Thanks
 
Marshall
 
 
Marshall Gisondi Piano Technician
Marshall's Piano Service
pianotune05 at hotmail.com
215-510-9400
Graduate of The School of Piano Technology for the Blind 
www.pianotuningschool.org Vancouver, WA
 
 
 
 
 
 
_________________________________________________________________
Windows 7: It works the way you want. Learn more.
http://www.microsoft.com/Windows/windows-7/default.aspx?ocid=PID24727::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WWL_WIN_evergreen:112009v2 
 
 


--Forwarded Message Attachment--
From: jonpage at comcast.net
To: pianotech at ptg.org
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 07:12:41 -0500
Subject: Re: [pianotech] regulating S&S (ex-) reproducer actions

The back check leather has probably lost it's resiliency. Either recover
with Ecsaine or replace them altogether.
 
I had an old Bluthner which had the same checking problem. The
suede was a bit stiff and I replaced it with Ecsaine. I was very surprised
with the outcome, the action took on an almost luxurious feel. The checking
problem disappeared. A softer check-in removed the impact of the check
which is felt in the finger and it improved the tone - double surprise.
 
Be careful with a deep dip, jack can start to break on those old wippens.
Make sure the jack is not bound between the stop felt and let off button.
-- 
 
Regards,
 
Jon Page
 


--Forwarded Message Attachment--
From: pmc033 at earthlink.net
To: pianotech at ptg.org
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 05:00:35 -0800
Subject: Re: [pianotech] regulating S&S (ex-) reproducer actions

Hi, David:
	I'm not a rebuilder, but I'll put in my $.02.  The difficulty with a
longer key lies in the geometry.  The hammers check because the arc of the
backcheck intersects the arc of the hammer tail.  The extra length of the
key makes the radius longer than a regular key, and so the arcs don't come
together until the key has moved a greater distance thru that arc.  Draw a
simple diagram with two different key lengths showing a side view and
you'll get it.  
	Also, beware the spring strength.  If you have a short blow distance, the
spring doesn't "wind up" as much, so it will take a greater tension to lift
the hammer.  
	FWIW.
	Paul McCloud
	San Diego
 
> [Original Message]
> From: David Nereson <da88ve at gmail.com>
> To: <pianotech at ptg.org>
> Date: 11/18/2009 11:04:59 PM
> Subject: [pianotech] regulating S&S (ex-) reproducer actions
>
>     I'm told by an esteemed rebuilder colleague that the 
> Steinway reproducer actions don't regulate quite the same as the 
> "regular" actions because the longer keys change the action 
> geometry.  He says he usually has to compromise something in the 
> regulation for better playability.
>     I regulated one (player system removed) after installing new 
> hammers & shanks and can't quite get rid of bobbling hammers. 
> Or, not so much bobbling as hammers not wanting to check on a 
> soft blow.
>     The key height is as high as it can be without interference 
> from the fallboard.  The blow is about as high as it can be (1 
> 5/8") -- any higher and the bass hammers won't fit under the 
> pinblock.  The dip was quite deep (almost 1/2") and I lessened 
> it to make it closer to 7/16".
>     The aftertouch is minimal.  It's there, but just barely.  I 
> know some say aftertouch should be 0.4 mm, which to my mind is 
> no aftertouch.
>     What prevents hammers from checking on a soft blow?  Seems 
> no matter how much I fool with backcheck angle and distance from 
> the tail, some of them just will not check.  No, I don't think 
> the rep springs are too strong.
>     Also the touch is too light -- about 45 grams DW.  Vertigris 
> infested the entire action, which was the main reason for 
> replacing shanks.  Customer's budget couldn't afford new wippens 
> or repinning all the rep levers, jacks, and wippen flanges, so I 
> "zapped" them all to free them up, tefloned the knuckles, 
> rebushed keys, & sprayed McLube on the keypins, since the action 
> was extremely sluggish before.  But maybe all that was too much. 
> I don't know how to make the touch heavier now except to repin 
> all the wippen parts or install new ones, or re-balance the keys 
> (move the key leads).
>     --David Nereson, RPT 
>
 
 
 
 		 	   		  
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/177141665/direct/01/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/pianotech.php/attachments/20091119/55fe50a0/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the pianotech mailing list

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC