PAULREVENKOJONES at aol.com wrote: > All worthwhile considerations. Yet it is striking, no pun intended, as > has been pointed out, that RC&S boards _seem_ to need less hammer > movement. Why is this so threatening to you? Two people who design and build these systems in the real world have indicated that it is either less necessary, or altogether unnecessary to deviate from a straight strike line for tonal purposes in a RC&S board. If you, not having built boards like this at all, so lacking any experience with same, know better than those of us who have, why don't you inform us as to why we don't know what we're talking about instead of weaseling around this semantic bullshit? If you're not interested in learning anything outside your marketable experience, that's your call, but someone else might be. This information has been offered in all honesty as real and verified as valid by building the damned things and trying it. If you have anything real and pertinent to contribute besides speculation and misdirection, please do. Ron N
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC