[pianotech] WNG Parts Question(s)

William Truitt surfdog at metrocast.net
Mon Jul 5 18:05:52 MDT 2010


Dear Joe:

 

I'm the guy with the Steinway A.  I've shared my problems with the forum on
these WNG parts, which lead to others who have used the parts chiming in
with their own or similar issues.  That, I think is to everyone's benefit as
an opportunity to learn.  The times I have learned new things about my craft
have usually been when I have been smacking up against a wall of one kind or
another.  That has been true here for me also.

 

Frankly Joe, you sound smug and sanctimonious with your put down.  What
purpose that is intended to serve, I cannot ascertain.  It's my blood on the
floor with the time consumption in working through installing and using
these WNG parts, but somehow I can manage to be more charitable than you to
Wessell, Nickel, and Gross.  

 

I bought these parts over a year ago and they sat on the shelf for quite a
while before I unboxed them and hung them on the rails.  What I have are
early production run parts.  Many (but not all) of the issues I had with
them have been corrected in subsequent production runs.  It's one thing to
design something in the lab and build prototypes, quite another to bring it
into production.  It is totally unrealistic in any new enterprise to arrive
at perfection on the first day out - you don't find out what the new
problems are until you have them.  I don't even expect perfection from the
other suppliers who have been around 30, 50, 100 years because I sure don't
get it from them either.  And they are not always interested in listening,
if they hear us at all. 

 

I was attracted to these parts not because they are modern technology,
although the inventiveness behind them certainly is in many ways "modern
technology" .  Living in New Hampshire, I rebuild in a world of humidity
extremes.  So the nylon -glass composite's stability is a definite plus.
And the modularity of the parts is desirable too.  I ended up relocating the
capstans (had to, going from an angled heel to straight), and the relocated
capstan heel was close but not exactly where the Steinway replacement whip
would have been.  Feels great though, and that's the bottom line.

 

To address your other issues:

 

"Shank flexibility is necessary for tone and repetition."  As far as that
goes, that's a fair statement.  What is the optimal shank flexibility?  I
don't have that answer nor, I suspect, do you.  Bruce Clark says the carbon
fiber shanks are stiffer than wood, and you can ask him how much stiffer -
he probably knows.  But I can't really hear a difference tonally that I can
attribute to the carbon fiber shanks.  If it's there, it's hidden under a
whole bunch of other things that likely have more effect on the tone for
good or ill.  So I'll simply say that I don't think it is a significant
effector on the tone.  Nor have I had any issues with repetition that were
attributable to the shanks.  

 

"Removing hammers, with a hollow tube for a shank, would be pretty much
impossible."  Should I assume from that remark that the gold standard by
which you judge  new parts is whether or not you have a tool in your kit
that you c an use with it?

 

"As for the Steinway A with these parts, that's about as far afield as it
can get to NOT being a Steinway. "   Why, WHAT about them makes them any
further afield than a Renner or Abel or Tokiwa?  You probably know that the
ONE kind of shank, and the ONE kind of whippen that we can get from you know
who is one size fits all, except they don't.  We can often get parts made
from other suppliers that better match the original ones of the vintage
piano we are working on, or do the waters of action geometry part like the
Red Sea when the G-E-N-U-I-N-E Steinway parts arrive?  I say that with a
modular shank and modular whippen (which is otherwise designed to be on a
Steinway), I am in the best position to honor the original action  geometry
or God Forbid, improve it.  But wait, it's a STEINWAY, that couldn't be
possible..

 

I don't use Steinway bass strings either, because I can get strings that
sound much better and for less, too.  And they sound like a Steinway.  Wait,
no they don't - you don't hear those shitty overtones anymore.

 

"Not recommended for any resale situation, per most dealers I know."  This
is a customer rebuild, and the customer knows I am using these parts.  How
large is your dealer sample on which you base your resale viability
assertion?  Inquiring minds want to know. 

 

Joe, when you are pissing on others, be careful where you aim.  You never
know when you are going to be hit by a sudden updraft..  J

 

Will Truitt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

From: pianotech-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf
Of Joseph Garrett
Sent: Monday, July 05, 2010 2:20 PM
To: Al Guecia/AlliedPianoCraft; pianotech at ptg.org
Subject: Re: [pianotech] WNG Parts Question(s)

 

Agreed. However, for odd-ball type PSO's, (which I work on, a lot), It might
be the way to go, as a last resort sort of thingee.<G>

Joe

 

Joe Garrett, R.P.T. (Oregon)

Captain, Tool Police

Squares R I

 

 

 

----- Original Message ----- 

From: Al Guecia/AlliedPianoCraft <mailto:AlliedPianoCraft at hotmail.com>  

To: joegarrett at earthlink.net;pianotech at ptg.org

Sent: 7/5/10 10:02:01 AM 

Subject: Re: [pianotech] WNG Parts Question(s)

 

I guess the next tool WNG needs is an tight fitting insert with a ridge to
remove the hammers. Being a traditional Steinway man, I don't think I could
go that route.

 

Al - 
High Point, NC

From: Joseph <mailto:joegarrett at earthlink.net>  Garrett 

Sent: Monday, July 05, 2010 12:55 PM

To: pianotech <mailto:pianotech at ptg.org>  

Subject: Re: [pianotech] WNG Parts Question(s)

 

David Love asked: "With all these issues, what's the overriding advantage in
using them?" 

 

 

David,

Omygawd, they're modern Technology! So,....that makes em' "da best",
donchaknow??<G>

Personally, I'm giving all of this stuff a wide berth and wait for all the
flack to quit falling.<G>

Two thoughts: 1. Shank flexibility is necessary for tone and repetition,
IMHO. 2. Removing hammers, with a hollow tube for a shank, using traditional
tools, would be pretty much impossible, IMHO.

As for the Steinway "A" with these parts...that's about as far afield as it
can get, to NOT being a Steinway. Not recommended for any resale situation,
per most Dealers I know.

Joe  

 

 

Joe Garrett, R.P.T. (Oregon)

Captain, Tool Police

Squares R I

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://ptg.org/pipermail/pianotech.php/attachments/20100705/a3c5fe00/attachment.htm>


More information about the pianotech mailing list

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC