David Love wrote: > Which brings up an interesting point about downbearing generally as it > relates to RC&S designs. Since the board is designed to have the required > amount of stiffness without compression and without that added compression > afforded by downbearing, how much downbearing is appropriate for these > boards. I say very little is required and my experience (and experiments) > would seem to suggest that. In fact, normal downbearing settings might even > be detrimental and inhibit the board's up and down movement. I've come to > the conclusion that on true RC&S designs only about .5 degree of bearing is > required in the mid tenor, about .5 - .75 through the treble. As is typical > of other designs, 0 - .5 degrees of bearing in the bass. It seems to be > much easier to overload these boards than to underload them and traditional > bearing settings don't seem to bring out the best results. That differs considerably from my findings. As long as the back scale is long, no tuned rear duplex, the difference between 0.3° and 1.5°+ is negligible tonally. These things aren't nearly as bearing critical as conventional boards. I've set the bass on a couple of pianos at near 0°, and increased it to about 1.5° with no apparent penalty. Likewise, I've set the tenor and treble at about 0.3° or less (near zero) and again at 0.75°-2° with little appreciable change in the sound, if any. With a short back scale, I would agree with your numbers. But that's the back scale, not the board design. My take. Ron N
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC