On Feb 1, 2011, at 9:22 AM, David Love wrote: > Yes, as I read back through the thread I realize things have gotten somewhat > convoluted. If I were to distill it down to a central point I would say > this. The ugly little truth is that most aural tuners don’t tune as > accurately as they think they do. I think the exam points that out. That’s > not to say that they don’t produce acceptable, even high quality musical > results. There is evidently some leeway in this thing that we do. But to > suggest that using a device which produces on average a more accurate result > also produces a less musical result doesn’t really make much sense, unless > you would argue that a less accurate aural tuning is still more musical than > a more accurate etd tuning. It would seem that there’s some resistance > among some to accept the state of the art technology. … Yep. > … OK, now I'm done. You wish :-) Thanks for all the level headed input, David, however convoluted at times it became. Keith
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC