[pianotech] Bridge pin locations help (image oops)

David Love davidlovepianos at comcast.net
Fri Feb 4 11:20:45 MST 2011


There are probably multiple causes for "falseness" depending on how you define it. Individual string anomalies, flag polling bridge pins, poor capo terminations or even bridge movement which is just out of phase with string movement (a theory Del suggested to me on one occasion). 

I don't think that an imprecise match between the bridge bevel and the center of the pin is a cause, at least not where the pin contact is to the speaking side of the bridge bevel (unless it's extreme and contributes to flag polling). There are just too many examples of pianos where this occurs that do not have that problem.
David Love
www.davidlovepianos.com
(sent from bb)

-----Original Message-----
From: "Mr. Mac's" <tune-repair at allegiance.tv>
Sender: pianotech-bounces at ptg.org
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 12:07:50 
To: <pianotech at ptg.org>
Reply-To: pianotech at ptg.org
Subject: Re: [pianotech] Bridge pin locations help (image oops)

Roger,

With no offense intended, and with respect to my particular circumstance,
   I am hoping you are in error, and Ron is dead on target.

By the way: the event for Sunday has been canceled,
   so I shall have to wait until a bit later to determine the outcome.

Sincerely,

Keith

On Feb 4, 2011, at 11:21 AM, Roger at Integra.net wrote:

> Well, I guess we'll agree to disagree about the string seating verses loose pin. I believe the seating process is effective because the string is now laying flat against the bridge cap. I've found that false beats can be reduced or eliminated by seating, on both new pianos out of the crate that don't have loose pins and strings on 90 year old pianos that obviously have loose pins. …



More information about the pianotech mailing list

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC