I'm not saying I don't like the idea--if nothing else they were beautiful to look at--but I think I'd have gone about it a bit differently. With a little creative thought the action could have been constructed in a way that would have made the gap unnecessary. The bass/tenor break could have been made a little smoother but playing around with the string angles some. I also think it would have been interesting to play around with a flat-strung version of the idea. Flat-strung designs take some effort to get them to develop a nice, clean bass but it can be done. This would make it possible to develop an absolutely seamless bass-to-tenor transition. And it would have made the whole thing even more striking looking. Ah, well, it's unlikely anyone is going to do anything like this again. Too bad, it could be a nice niche market for somebody. ddf Delwin D Fandrich Piano Design & Fabrication 6939 Foothill Court SW, Olympia, Washington 98512 USA Phone 360.515.0119 Cell 360.388.6525 del at fandrichpiano.com ddfandrich at gmail.com -----Original Message----- From: pianotech-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf Of David Boyce Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 12:04 PM To: pianotech at ptg.org Subject: Re: [pianotech] Broadwood Barless Grand Del, you are right of course about the "jog" in the long bridge and the breaks in stringing which Will also commented on. Your point about "why bother" seems an entirely fair one! But it's interesting at any rate, that Broadwood had the financial confidence in those days to play about with these design experiments. I was fascinated by the Broadwood upright with bridge agraffes I encountered a few months ago (i posted pics here). They certainly weren't scared to try stuff out! Best regards, David Boyce.
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC