[pianotech] Horse and buggy users.

Duaine Hechler dahechler at att.net
Wed Jul 20 11:18:57 MDT 2011


William,

Wrong again - I DO CARE.

However, as I am listening to the audio posted, it appears that it was NOT tested thoroughly - especially the tech list 
portion.

And, the tech list portion was NOT taken seriously enough to be one of the PRIMARY functions that WORKED UP FRONT.

Duaine

On 07/20/2011 11:09 AM, William Monroe wrote:
> Which is precisely my point.  You don't care about the functioning of the organization.  Some of us do.  Those of us 
> who are members have a vested interest in the organization doing well.  Some of us are willing to accept an initial 
> compromise in the functioning of the list to improve (maintain) the functioning of the organization as a whole. 
>  Without the organization, there is no list, Duaine.
>
> William R. Monroe
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Duaine Hechler <dahechler at att.net <mailto:dahechler at att.net>> wrote:
>
>     Again, William,
>
>     My membership DOES NOT come into play in this discussion - SO - just drop it.
>
>     FYI, I was a member until I could not afford the dues and the overall subject matter did not include much about
>     the antique player systems.
>
>     PLUS, as in what a lot of other persons are saying, who gives a rats arse about the home office - to us
>     (non-members included), it's all about the tech list (functionality, ease of use, syncing with other devices, etc)
>
>     Duaine
>
>
>     On 07/20/2011 10:45 AM, William Monroe wrote:
>
>         Again, Duaine,
>
>         It goes beyond the list serv and it's function.  It encompasses all of the PTG organizational functions as well.
>
>         As a non-member I can see how that is meaningless to you, but to some of us it does matter.
>
>         William R. Monroe
>
>
>
>
>         On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Duaine Hechler <dahechler at att.net <mailto:dahechler at att.net>
>         <mailto:dahechler at att.net <mailto:dahechler at att.net>>> wrote:
>
>            Here we go again .........
>
>            I thought this subject was supposed to be banned - I know I got my last email "slapped" for bringing this
>         up again.
>
>            So now that it is here again, I'll chime in again.
>
>            Comparison of the new list, is like the Edsel.
>
>            It was ahead of it's time ..... not well accepted ..... and became a rare antique very quickly.
>
>            I see the new list going in the same direction.
>
>            As you can see, this was submitted under the old list - only.
>
>            Regards, Duaine
>
>            P.S. What happened to the old adage - "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" ?!?!?!?!?
>
>            On 07/20/2011 09:11 AM, William Monroe wrote:
>
>                Will,
>
>                I can't say that I condone Israel's approach to "encouraging" everyone to use the new system.  I can say,
>                however, that your suggestion, you quoted,
>
>                "If a thing can be done adequately by means of one, it is superfluous to do it by means of several; for we
>                observe that nature does not employ two instruments [if] one suffice”.  That’s a pretty good measure
>         for any
>                software interface design.  By that measure, to claim that the new HL forum software represents a paradigm
>                shift is laughable."
>
>                It is essential that everyone who reads this forum (and who will eventually be using the new system)
>                understands that the paradigm shift (it really is) reaches far beyond email lists.  The new software works
>                wonderfully for so much of what the home office needs it to do to track and maintain membership,
>                communications, and the integrating so many needs for the organization - of which the email list is
>         only one.
>
>                Please understand, I value the list as much as anyone, and I don't mean to imply that the new system is as
>                simple as the old.  Neither do I intend to denigrate any of it's users.  However, there are other
>                considerations for PTG besides the list.  The new software does a remarkable job filling the needs of
>         the PTG
>                and incorporating the lists as well.  I'll say it again because it is extremely important that we on
>         the list
>                fully understand:  the needs of PTG are much more than just the list.
>
>                To be sure, the list is important and it was considered.  And, it does continue to function on the new
>                software.  It is absolutely different.  It is in some ways more troublesome.  It is in some ways
>         better.  List
>                folks (and I include myself in that number) need to move past the initial frustrations, log on, take
>         the time
>                to get set up as your needs see fit, and learn to use it.  If we simply refuse to use it, it will never
>         work
>                for us.  I'm discovering that as I use it more, it becomes vastly simpler.
>
>                Again, the new software is a big step forward for the PTG on the organizational level.  It may
>         complicate the
>                list function for a bit until we all take the time to learn to use it effectively, but it will happen.
>
>                William R. Monroe
>
>
>
>
>                On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Encore Pianos <encorepianos at metrocast.net
>         <mailto:encorepianos at metrocast.net> <mailto:encorepianos at metrocast.net <mailto:encorepianos at metrocast.net>>
>         <mailto:encorepianos at metrocast.net <mailto:encorepianos at metrocast.net> <mailto:encorepianos at metrocast.net
>         <mailto:encorepianos at metrocast.net>>>> wrote:
>
>                   Dear Isreal:
>
>                   Hmmmm….     “:fellow luddites”, “horse and buggy drivers complaining how difficult it is to start a
>         car”,
>                   “horseshit”, “can the attitude”, “small but loud group who refuse to develop basic web skills”
>         “files YOU
>                PEOPLE
>                   were shoving onto my computer (caps added by me, wow, a conspiracy, what fun!)  “massaging each
>         other’s egos”
>
>                   And now for the real kicker, “the relatively minor glitches that any paradigm shift entails”.   PARADIGM
>                   SHIFT?????!!!!!!!!,  Isn’t that a bit like a 2 ½  foot tall guy dunking the ball into a basket 2
>         feet off the
>                   ground and claiming “player of the year?”
>
>                   Jon Page doesn’t need me to defend him and I won’t speak for him.  I will say that I have met Jon
>         and spent a
>                   little time with him, and have followed his posts on the forum over the past years.  Somehow,
>         luddite  never
>                   enters my mind when I think of Jon.  And please note that the group of people you describe as
>         luddites and
>                horse
>                   and buggy drivers includes the following people, if we are including those who have expressed their
>         lack of
>                   enthusiasm for the new forum:   Del Fandrich, Ron Nossaman, Dale Erwin, David Andersen,  and David Love;
>                amongst
>                   many ohers.
>
>                   I admire both Del and Ron for their approach to problem solving and design, because they so well
>         apply these
>                   variations on “Occam’s Razor”,   “Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication” and “Entities must not be
>                multiplied
>                   beyond necessity”.  It is always  a sign of an elegant and penetrating mind to seek the simplest and
>         most
>                 direct
>                   solution.that fulfills all necessary criteria.
>
>                   I think this saying from Saint Thomas Aquinas is most topical when thinking of software,
>         particularly the HL
>                   PIanotech web software: "If a thing can be done adequately by means of one, it is superfluous to do
>         it by
>                means of
>                   several; for we observe that nature does not employ two instruments [if] one suffice”.  That’s a
>         pretty good
>                   measure for any software interface design.  By that measure, to claim that the new HL forum software
>                represents a
>                   paradigm shift is laughable.
>
>                   Will Truitt
>
>
>
>            --     Duaine Hechler
>            Piano, Player Piano, Pump Organ
>            Tuning, Servicing&  Rebuilding
>            Reed Organ Society Member
>            Florissant, MO 63034
>         (314) 838-5587 <tel:%28314%29%20838-5587> <tel:%28314%29%20838-5587>
>         dahechler at att.net <mailto:dahechler at att.net> <mailto:dahechler at att.net <mailto:dahechler at att.net>>
>         www.hechlerpianoandorgan.com <http://www.hechlerpianoandorgan.com> <http://www.hechlerpianoandorgan.com>
>
>            --
>            Home&  Business user of Linux - 11 years
>
>
>
>
>
>     -- 
>     Duaine Hechler
>     Piano, Player Piano, Pump Organ
>     Tuning, Servicing&  Rebuilding
>     Reed Organ Society Member
>     Florissant, MO 63034
>     (314) 838-5587 <tel:%28314%29%20838-5587>
>     dahechler at att.net <mailto:dahechler at att.net>
>     www.hechlerpianoandorgan.com <http://www.hechlerpianoandorgan.com>
>     --
>     Home&  Business user of Linux - 11 years
>
>
>


-- 
Duaine Hechler
Piano, Player Piano, Pump Organ
Tuning, Servicing&  Rebuilding
Reed Organ Society Member
Florissant, MO 63034
(314) 838-5587
dahechler at att.net
www.hechlerpianoandorgan.com
--
Home&  Business user of Linux - 11 years



More information about the pianotech mailing list

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC