Yes, that was part of the thinking. It has also worked rather well for committee correspondences, including documents and files that we all want to have access to. I don't know if that qualifies for a "discussion forum" or not, but it works well for that use, too. Especially when the committee has turnover. New members can easily see what has transpired with the committee for the last however many days they choose. I really have no problem using the new system. William R. Monroe On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 3:55 PM, John Formsma <formsma at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Ron Nossaman <rnossaman at cox.net> wrote: > >> >> >> You're kidding, right? If it wasn't working for the home office, it would >> have been dumped long ago. >> Ron N >> > > > Yeah, it works for them because they are not on a discussion forum. At > least they'd better not be! > > I'm all for helping the home office. But they apparently tried to combine > their needs with ours. In that attempt to kill two birds with one stone, I > think even more birds have died in the process. > > -- > John Formsma, RPT > Blue Mountain, MS > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/20111025/19f428d3/attachment.htm>
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC