[pianotech] Grand Backcheck Geometry

Dale Erwin erwinspiano at aol.com
Tue Feb 28 20:02:11 MST 2012


Jim
  Richard Davenport has this to say. The back check needs to be at a 72 degree angle to the key.  The radius on the hammer tail must be made on a 3 inch arc. The back check face and the hammer face should be parallel at rest. DO this and good checking is mostly positive. So there it is throw out the cad and the microscope. St checking no more or no less than 12 to 14 mm. So get some sleep pal. 
  Of course a high or low action ratio could change the dynamics but I'm not prepared to jump in on that.


Dale Erwin RPT-
 Mason & Hamlin/Steinway/U.S pianos
Pre-hung Ronsen hammer sets/Abel parts
Sitka Soundboards & Supplies
WWW.Erwinspiano.com
209-577-8397

 
  





-----Original Message-----
From: jim <jim at grandpianosolutions.com>
To: pianotech <pianotech at ptg.org>
Sent: Tue, Feb 28, 2012 5:33 pm
Subject: [pianotech] Grand Backcheck Geometry


Is there someone who could explain the actual geometry, ie intersecting 
arcs that are necessary to achieve optimal grand backchecking.

There is lots of info regarding tail length/radius, height of check in 
relation to the hammer at various points in the stroke, etc, offered as 
a "prescription" for good checking.  But I' trying to understand the 
actual geometry that will achieve good checking, ie the shape of the 
backcheck face, what the actual geometry of the two meeting faces 
optimally are (radiused tail and backcheck cushion) in relation to the 
arcs the backcheck and tail are swing in. Also obviously how these arcs 
are effected by  varying amounts of key dip.

Maybe the geometry I'm asking for is actually a graduate course in 
calculus, and the "prescriptions" being empirical explanations of what 
seems to work?

The reason I ask is I have been stymied by 2 unsusual actions of late,  
actions which don't adhere to normal string heights or key lengths, and 
am having trouble applying the "prescriptions".  I don't like flying 
blind, and though my drawing in autocad might get me there, that the 
optimal mating face of the tail/cushion are seem to be something other 
than what I thought was obvious (I think).

Jim Ialeggio




-- 
Jim Ialeggio
jim at grandpianosolutions.com
(978) 425-9026
Shirley, MA


 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/20120228/7034dedb/attachment.htm>


More information about the pianotech mailing list

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC