While they perform similar functions the two bridge pieces are of quite different design. There were two basic problems with the Sohmer implementation of this idea. First, the tension of the strings put a constant twisting force on the agrafe that ultimately either twisted the bridge/soundboard panel or split the bridge. Second, this tendency to either twist or split was exacerbated by some of the highest string tensions ever seen in a modern piano. One that I rebuilt had string tensions measuring over 250 lbf (yes, that is per individual string) through much of the tenor and lower treble section. That's enough to destroy any piano. By contrast the type of bridge termination device used by Stuart, et al do not put any twisting force on the bridge. ddf Delwin D Fandrich Piano Design & Fabrication 6939 Foothill Court SW, Olympia, Washington 98512 USA Phone 360.515.0119 - Cell 360.388.6525 <mailto:del at fandrichpiano.com> del at fandrichpiano.com - <mailto:ddfandrich at gmail.com> ddfandrich at gmail.com From: pianotech-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:pianotech-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf Of Euphonious Thumpe Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2012 3:04 AM To: pianotech at ptg.org Subject: Re: [pianotech] 102 keys and 4 pedals??? While I'm sure it's a great piano (and I'd surely like to play one!) it is interesting to note that the 2 "innovations" that are seemed to be claimed as original are the bridge agraffe (which we've all just deeply discussed) and a lifting hammer rail, as was used on reproducing pianos a century ago. But it would definitely be interesting to see if the bridge agraffe design on the Stuart overcomes the issues that Sohmer et al suffered with their versions last century. (I hope it works and creates no problems.) Other than that, all I can say is that the text is in dire need of a copy editor! When attempting to market what is surely an extremely "high-end" product, it is far more convincing when the advertising material is bereft of spelling and word use "goofs"! (I found several.) Thumpe _____ From: Jason Kanter <jkanter at rollingball.com>; To: Pianotech <pianotech at ptg.org>; Subject: [pianotech] 102 keys and 4 pedals??? Sent: Sat, Nov 3, 2012 5:14:26 AM http://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/music/grand-design-resonates-with-young- musicians-20121102-28ppk.html Any of you Ozzies familiar with this Stuart & Sons piano? Jason Kanter -- | || ||| || ||| || ||| || ||| || ||| || ||| || ||| jason's cell 425 830 1561 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/20121103/93a9dc15/attachment.htm>
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC