Phil, You said: ".From: Phil Bondi Posted: Sunday February 24, 2013 8:53 PM Subject: RE:Pianotech Mail-List Server closing April 1st Message: Paul, The reason for the multiple methods is this: There's been enough flack given to the Board about my.ptg.org from pianotech at ptg.org that they felt giving that list of participants an option was necessary. The Electronic Communications Committee was asked to come up with an alternative to pianotech at ptg.org. They gave us Google+, which in my opinion has possibilities. It's not email, and that alone has its drawbacks for some, but it is an alternative. The Board also recognizes that there are a few more options out there for piano techs to have discussion and ask questions. Pianoworld comes to mind as an active place for techs. Personally I am not involved there, but am aware of it. The PTG Facebook page has had its share of discussion there also. The Board would like nothing more than to have all the finest techs in the world discussing here on this platform. Being realistic that's not going to happen. Paul, I hope that answers your question." ------------------------------------------- -phil, Are you speaking on behalf of the entire Board? Or, just yourself/ Or, just for the Executive Committee, that has been extremely silent? The above is crap and you know it. So much placating garbage imo. I expect more from you Phil. You, of all people should be able to know what is right for PTG. The HL format is not cutting it. Face it. Admit it. And, move on to something for EVERYONE! Let's gather the flock into one field, not scatter them helter skelter! In my opinion, the Delcour thing could work. No one has given it a try, as far as I know. I haven't, because it got lost in the B.S. of HL ala Executive Board Rhetoric! Grrrr! I am sending this one to the real list. I hope that won't piss off too many people.<G> Joe Joe Garrett, R.P.T. Captain of the Tool Police Squares R I http://gpianoworks.com/
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC