Good point both of you on the brad point. Why 1/0? From what i understand, it has a nicer feel because of the decreased surface area contact with the wood. Plus it leaves more room for coils and string clearance. Plus they're less expensive i think (though that is an after-thought). Plus i like fine things. Thinner is finer :) Any reason why not? On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Ron Nossaman <rnossaman at cox.net> wrote: > On 3/6/2013 1:57 PM, Noah Frere wrote: > >> I searched my not inconsiderable archives for an answer, but have come >> up empty-handed. I am using 1/0 Denro blued tuning pins in a new >> multi-lam Maple pinblock, and need to order the drill bit. I'd like to >> double-drill - makes sense. The Pianotek catalog recommends, in effect, >> a drill bit .016" to .021" under the diameter of a 2/0 pin in a >> multi-lam pinblock. Following that logic, I could use the .250" on the >> first pass, and the .261" (.015" under) or .257" (.019" under) drill bit >> on the second pass. Also, I like the idea of the brad-points, but also >> like the idea of the other ones, which are "slow spiral." Any >> recommendations? >> > > You can't use brad points on the second pass anyway, so decide if they > will get you anything desirable on the first and buy accordingly. Slow > spiral, definitely, particularly on the second pass. The 0.250" should be > fine for the first pass. As to final size, as Greg said, test - etc. > > Why 1/0? > > Ron N > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/20130306/ce5d48dd/attachment.htm>
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC