Fred Sturm writes... > A side-effect of the low deflection angle is the tendency to create > obnoxious sizzling noises.or by > muting off the forward duplex section by inserting hammer felt wedges, > folded bushing cloth, or the like between two strings. Doing this, of > course, also results in loss of the "bloom" or whatever one wants to call > the positive effect. I guess I shouldn't omit > that one can also voice them out by needling the hammer in some instances. Sometimes the "sizzling" noises can be gotten rid of by tape, duct or scotch placed on the wire as it crosses the duplex bar.This works if the sound can be gotten rid of by light finger pressure on the offending segment. I found that felt inbetween the strings resulted in to much tonal loss as Fred observed. Its uneasy to think of the effects of the tape residues there, but it worked, and for long periods of time there were no sizzles without the tape. But this was an M that even though in a recording studio was a d-o-g. Yet the engineers chose it over another M that I considered definitive of the M sound. It was later that this engineer's best friend started "howeling" When asked what caused these zings I mumbled something about microscopic rust spots caused by sweat or breath vapor from the player. (Which now makes me wish I had tried flossing)...... They could relate to that as they used spit shields (I don't know what they call them) in front of their thousand dollar mics. We talked about putting a felt cover over the pins out to the agraffs and bearing bar, but nothing came of it. Richard Moody
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC