On 3/6/02 2:15 PM, "Wolfley, Eric (WOLFLEEL)" <WOLFLEEL@UCMAIL.UC.EDU> wrote: > Wouldn't good unisons amongst all 4 pianos be preferable? Ah, but, are you _sure_ (rhetorical question) that tuning all 4 pianos to the same tuning record would produce the best unisons, especially in the tenor? If A2, for a given piano, is calculated to make a good double-octave with A4, wouldn't another piano's calculation for the tuning of its A2 make a reasonable unison with the first piano's A2, even if it is "different"? They would still more or less line up at A4, at least. Think about it. :) I would urge you to take the advice voiced here several times and tune each piano to its own calculated tuning. Your point that using a single tuning record for all the pianos would simply put different levels of stretch in the various pianos is correct, but I think the tuning variations resulting from inharmonicity differences from piano to piano are somewhat greater those tuning variations that result from differences in stretch preferences from tech to tech. To answer your question about concert stretch preferences, I start with (RCT speak) OTS 4 because I can't stand excessive stretch in the mid-range and tenor. I use CEQ to add lots of extra stretch at A5 and A6, up to OTS 7-8 levels for that part of the scale. Kent Swafford
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC