Answers to Willems Questions about the formula (LONG)

[Wimblees@aol.com]

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
In a message dated 5/3/02 11:28:04 AM Central Daylight Time, 
jorge1ml@cmich.edu writes:


> Hi Willem and Others,
>        Please be aware that my answers below are my own views and may or
> may not reflect the reasoning of the rest of the committee.  The more I
> study the formulas the more I appreciate the intelligence of the old
> formula and the revisions Fred has introduced.
> 
> 

Mike

Thank you very much for taking the time and trouble to answer all of my 
questions and concerns. After reading your responses, I realize where the 
problems are with my plan. I am still having some problem digesting the CAUT 
formula, but hopefully with some of the changes that seem to be coming, I 
might actually get a handle on it. 

I want to also thank Eric for his words of wisdom. Together with what the 
both of you wrote, I have a better understanding, and appreciation, of the 
CAUT formula. And thank you both also for at least not trashing my plan, and 
giving it some sense of credibility. Hopefully it can be of some use to 
someone. 

Wim

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/caut.php/attachments/8a/b9/be/d1/attachment.htm

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--