This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
Vince-
Never having learned calculus, I don't know how to work a formula like =
this.
Assuming that I have
-Strikeweight continuity within Stanwood's suggested range
-Frontweight continuity within Stanwood's ceiling
-Even and acceptable DW & UW
How can I use this formula to improve action performance?
Thanks!
Ed Sutton
----- Original Message -----=20
From: madelyn mrykalo=20
To: College and University Technicians=20
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 12:56 AM
Subject: Re: Touch weight
Hi-
Of course you can have acceptable DW's & UW's and at the same time =
have a wide range of moments of inertia, some which may be acceptable =
and some which may not be. Or the front weights could be too high. =
That's why I don't think UW/DW alone tells us enough about how the =
action "feels". =20
=20
Here is a formula for moment of inertia (I):
I=3D m1r12 + m2r22 + m3r32 + ... + mnrn2 =20
=20
Where m is the mass and r (radius) is the distance that the mass is =
from the balance hole of the key. The key itself has some moment of =
inertia too.
=20
So the action in question (Wim's D) might weigh off acceptably (DW and =
UW), but also may have a too heavy a front weight, and/or moment of =
inertia.
=20
Stanwood has come up with a good standard of front weights. Moment of =
inertia standards are a little more ambiguous at this point. More =
importantly is that the moments be reasonably smooth from key to key.
Brian is right.
Brian Lawson <lawsonic@bdmail.co.za> wrote:
Hi, I think he is referring to the English language with use of a =
virgule and
not a division sign
3 : a mark / used typically to denote "or" (as in and/or), "and or" =
(as in
straggler/deserter), or "per" (as in feet/second) -- called also =
slash, solidus,
virgule
Brian
----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard Brekne"=20
To: "College and University Technicians"=20
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 3:29 PM
Subject: Re: Touch weight
madelyn mrykalo wrote:
> HI-More telling than downweight/upweight is moment of =
inertia/front
> weight (which are two different things). UW/DW will not, in and of
> itself, tell much of anything about the action's feel.
>
I think you want to explain this a bit further for us. How exactly =
are
you ariving at ! the moment of inertia (for the key) and what does
dividing that by FW tell us exactly ?
Cheers
RicB
Vince Mrykalo
University of Utah
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----
Do you Yahoo!?
New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/caut.php/attachments/44/69/aa/03/attachment.htm
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC