This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
How mortifying! All this while I've been maligning a whole genre, ignoring improvements too suble to notice. I had not noticed that these things were fanning their ribs and morphing their scales as they pulled themselves out of the primordial ooze by their dog-legged bridle wires & synthetic buckskin. :-) I always knew evolutionary theory had some flaws!
Otto
----- Original Message -----
From: Roger Jolly
To: College and University Technicians
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 5:35 PM
Subject: RE: Baldwin 743 question
Hi Paul,
Sorry you are wrong, 243HP is an entirely different scale, Ask Del. <G> That model has a fanned rib configuration, plus other subtle improvements. The 743 scale has parallel ribs two small damper blocks, vs tri damper blocks.. Oh well??????
Regards Roger
At 06:06 PM 4/15/2004, you wrote:
Complete correct term is HP-243.
Paul Kupelian
SUNY Oswego (ret.)
-----Original Message-----
From: caut-bounces@ptg.org [mailto:caut-bounces@ptg.org] On Behalf Of Otto Keyes
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 6:47 PM
To: College and University Technicians
Subject: Re: Baldwin 743 question
I agree with your last comment Mark. However, I always thought they were 243's (or perhaps deserving of an even lower numeric designation). From whence came this 500 point elevation? For me, these always bore the designation of "Bald-swine". Only redeeming feature is the lid prop -- but even that gets in the way of tuning.
Otto
Please pardon the abscence of optimism, but I find servicing the 743's, beyond tuning, tends to underwhelm even the most meager expectations.
Mark Cramer,
Brandon University
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/caut.php/attachments/2c/a6/9e/97/attachment.htm
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC