(no subject)

[Richard Brekne]

Hi David


"David C. Stanwood" wrote:
> 
> I don't have any old copies of that chart at hand.  What specifically changed?
> 
>

Your reccommended SW curves for any given ratio are exactly 1 curve
lower now then when the smart chart was released.

For example.

a 5.7 ratio related to top medium (# 9) curve
a 5.5 ratio related to low heavy (# 10) curve
a 6.0 ratio fell just under a #8 curve... around 3/4 medium 

Compare that to what you wrote today

"David C. Stanwood" wrote:
> What's the average StrikeWt Ratio?  An important question! 

> 5.7 is good for 3/4Med SW,       (#8)
> 5.5 for TopMed SW.               (#9)
> 6.0 won't do very well dynamically speaking unless the SW level is
> closer to 1/2 med.               (#7)
>

as you can see... your present recommendations are one curve lighter for
same ratio.

RicB
__________________________________________
 
> >Ok... grin..
> >
> >So what exactly made you decide to drop lower the recommended SW curve
> >for a given Ratio on notch then ? You must have had some basic
> >reasonings beyond the general statement below. Just curious you know.
> >
> >Glad to see your name pop up again btw.
> >
> >Cheers
> >RicB
> 
> _______________________________________________
> caut list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives