Categories - Paying examiners/Assoc. declassification

Erwinspiano@aol.com Erwinspiano@aol.com
Fri, 28 May 2004 12:08:37 EDT


---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
In a message dated 5/28/2004 7:51:33 AM Pacific Standard Time, 
marysmith@mail.utexas.edu writes:
Good points, Dale. Many of us were not as fortunate as you in that you were 
trained by highly skilled and trusted techs. For those of us (like myself) who 
attended, shall we say, somewhat less-than-spectacular training schools (the 
one I attended is no longer around), the RPT exams do indeed serve as ENTRY 
LEVEL requirements. Let's hear it for continuing education! The PTG can help 
promote and further better technical work, but it is the technician who must take 
advantage of the offerings...

Mary 
        Mary 
  You are absolutely right! I was fortunate & I also realize most are not. 
However  for me the Incredible value of PTG has been inestimable in my on going 
education. I learned very solid basic skills from my Dad but the traing was 
quite incomplete in many areas. ie grand regulation rebuilding skill. 
   As technolgy & information evelove it was ptg that developed deciminated 
it I & you & any one with a desire have been the benificiarys.
   I often say Most of what I no came thru this organization & networking 
with members.
    To paraphrase your last statement...... you can lead a horse to 
water.........
 Its up to the indidivual. RpT status or not I would have still availed 
myself to this process of info. The tuning test was an incredible bench mark moment 
for me though in 1980. I was nervous but passed with high marks & the bench 
marking aspect  was a good thing.
   Dale
  my 

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/caut.php/attachments/ba/48/e7/13/attachment.htm

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC