Thanks for the clarification, Kent. Reading the policy, it sounds like boilerplate to me. But if what you say is true, I guess we need to accept it. BTW, I don't ignore the policy, myself, just chafe at it. And thought a good "blast of the cannon" or two might provoke revisiting the issue. I guess it's already been revisited. Stupid law, in many of its applications, if it applies to us. Regards, Fred Sturm University of New Mexico On 4/10/05 12:18 PM, "Kent Swafford" <kswafford@earthlink.net> wrote: > Sigh... > > While it is true that at one time, we relied on a generic antitrust > policy, this has not been true for quite some time. Our current > antitrust policy was developed specifically for us, at the PTG board's > insistence. > > One of the reasons that PTG members must not "blow off" antitrust > considerations is _because_ we are so small; we would be an easy > target. > > Our current antitrust policy is the best we have been able to do, and > we must follow it. To suggest otherwise is foolhardy, to put it > bluntly. > > > Kent
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC