Thanks for the clarification, Kent. Reading the policy, it sounds like
boilerplate to me. But if what you say is true, I guess we need to accept
it.
BTW, I don't ignore the policy, myself, just chafe at it. And thought a
good "blast of the cannon" or two might provoke revisiting the issue. I
guess it's already been revisited. Stupid law, in many of its applications,
if it applies to us.
Regards,
Fred Sturm
University of New Mexico
On 4/10/05 12:18 PM, "Kent Swafford" <kswafford@earthlink.net> wrote:
> Sigh...
>
> While it is true that at one time, we relied on a generic antitrust
> policy, this has not been true for quite some time. Our current
> antitrust policy was developed specifically for us, at the PTG board's
> insistence.
>
> One of the reasons that PTG members must not "blow off" antitrust
> considerations is _because_ we are so small; we would be an easy
> target.
>
> Our current antitrust policy is the best we have been able to do, and
> we must follow it. To suggest otherwise is foolhardy, to put it
> bluntly.
>
>
> Kent
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC