[CAUT] Steinway Style II Grand

Greg Granoff gjg2@humboldt.edu
Wed, 16 Feb 2005 09:17:40 -0800


No problem...
You are right about the difference between good repros and tired old
originals, which are probably best left to museums as a way to get a clear
view of technical developments as time went along --although this is very
important as well, I feel. I should not have equated original instruments
with reproductions.
 And I totally agree about the "mythical market" you speak of created by
clueless owners who imagine that anything made anywhere in the 19th century
is by definition a valuable antique.  They hold technicians and restorers
hostage to an imagined outcome that usually doesn't exist.  These people
have neither the collector/curator's sense of ethics and perspective
regarding historical value, nor the musician's or technician's appreciation
of the differences in behavior and sound born of design.
I think its important to note, however, that while it is one thing to build
a reproduction of a late 18th century fortepiano from scratch, but quite
another to copy a late-ish 19th century piano such as the Steinway style II
which started this discussion.  Since such a project is (at this time,
anyway) extremely unlikely to happen, one could argue from a curator's
perspective that it would be more appropriate to conserve a piano like that
and find something else to enjoy playing--although in this case I admit I'm
on the fence....

Greg
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Chris Solliday" <solliday@ptd.net>
To: <caut@ptg.org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 10:01 PM
Subject: Fw: [CAUT] Steinway Style II Grand


> just in case this didn't get through the first time, please excuse the
> department of redundancy for any redundancy. Chris S
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Chris Solliday" <solliday@ptd.net>
> To: "College and University Technicians" <caut@ptg.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 12:46 AM
> Subject: Re: [CAUT] Steinway Style II Grand
>
>
> > I agree with all this rationale except the difference between repros and
> > "original." "Original" is a challenge not looked forward to by the
players
> > of the era that historical performance tries to recreate. I'm sure
players
> > of that time were looking for the best instruments available, not some
old
> > stressed out piece of wood surrounded by crusty buckskin and motheaten
> felt,
> > and dare I leave out the metal. My opinion, of course humble, is that
this
> > so called "original instrument" concept just creates a mythical market
for
> > the owners of some horrendous old dogs and unfortunately it obscures and
> > reduces the opportunities to hear the rather charming performance
> available
> > on reproductions, and not to mention reduces this important market. My
hat
> > is off to builders of repros, fortepianos, harpsichords and clavichords
> and
> > the performers who have the integrity and wisdom to perform/recreate
> > historical music on instruments of the same relative age as when the
music
> > was orginally performed. "the one armed piano tuner" Chris Solliday
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Greg Granoff" <gjg2@humboldt.edu>
> > To: "College and University Technicians" <caut@ptg.org>
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 3:37 PM
> > Subject: Re: [CAUT] Steinway Style II Grand
> >
> >
> > > I believe Conrad makes an important point here.  This isn't really
about
> > > what vintage of piano is an "improvement" over which other vintage.
We
> > have
> > > a Bach scholar here who is a harpsichordist/fortepianist who was one
of
> > the
> > > people most influential in the "period performance" movement in San
> > > Francisco when it began in the 60's.  She owns a modern piano and
enjoys
> > it
> > > as much as the next person.  However, she is always quick to point out
> > that
> > > period instruments, whether original or copies, playing and sounding
as
> > they
> > > would have when new (we hope) are like fascinating time machines.  As
> she
> > > puts it, they "send us messages" directly from the past that tell us
> > > important things about the music written for them, as well as the
> > > experiences and feelings and judgements of the listeners and
performers
> of
> > > the day as they moved about in their particular sonic world.  Modern
> > > pianists sometimes wonder why Beethoven often wrote such close chord
> > > voicings  in the bass cleff.  They sound like mud on a modern grand,
but
> > are
> > > perfectly understandable on a Viennese fortepiano of the day.  Many of
> the
> > > bow gestures inherent in period style baroque string playing that are
so
> > > necessary to the vividness and emotion of that sound did not become
> > apparent
> > > till people began using the lighter, lower tension Baroque bows, and
so
> > on.
> > > For this reason, I myself, and many others I'm sure would feel cheated
> out
> > > of a very dynamic sense of our own cultural past if no one ever
> performed
> > on
> > > period instruments and all obsolete instruments were updated.
> > >
> > > Just my 2 cents as well.
> > >
> > > Greg
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > > From: "Conrad Hoffsommer" <hoffsoco@luther.edu>
> > > To: "College and University Technicians" <caut@ptg.org>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 11:55 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [CAUT] Steinway Style II Grand
> > >
> > >
> > > > At 13:05 2/15/2005, you wrote:
> > > > >Wouldn't it be great to see Chris argue his point with Malcolm
> Bilson.
> > > > >Might turn into a slug fest! :-) Having lived here in Ithaca (the
> land
> > of
> > > > >historical performance practice) for some time, I find listening to
> > music
> > > > >performed on historical instruments interesting at least for an
> > academic
> > > > >standpoint. And, occasionally it is a great musical experience.
> Cornell
> > > > >has a couple of pianos from the mid 1800's that sound very good and
> > when
> > > > >played by a skilled pianist, can be very rewarding to hear. Just my
> > > humble
> > > > >opinion.
> > > > >
> > > > >Don
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >>  I may as well take this opportunity to come out of the closet
and
> > > > >> reveal my bias, actually a pet peave, just to be fair. In case
> anyone
> > > > >> wasn't catching the drift, I have almost no use for historical
> > > > >> instruments. I can't imagine any musician of the day, say Franz
> > Liszt,
> > > > >> looking for "the good old piano." Most often professional
pianists,
> > > > >> unless they are looking for novelty, or are overcome with this
> absurd
> > > > >> nostalgia for "original instruments," look for the best new piano
> > they
> > > > >> can find. 'Cause the design is up to date and the parts are new
and
> > it
> > > > >> plays like they expect. Everything else is ANOMALY. And unless
your
> > > > >> customer is of that ilk I'd stick to I-95. (I do make one notable
> > > > >> exception and that is reproductions. They make for wonderful
> > > > >> "Historical" concerts although I do think the whole concept is a
> bit
> > > > >> hysterical). Of course Stephen, be attentive to what Bill Shull
and
> > > > >> others are warning of cause this isn't I-95, but get as close as
> you
> > > can
> > > > >> and a "NORMAL" customer will be happy. And BTW, sorry Bill, we're
> > full
> > > > >> at MARC and printed for this year, but I have forwarded your
> > shameless
> > > > >> self invitation to Steve and Paul and will put in a good word for
> > you.
> > > > >>Best to All,
> > > > >>  Chris Solliday
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I really like Ansel Adams' black and white photography.
> > > > Ansel Adams had access to color film.
> > > >
> > > > I like Mozart on the fortepiano.
> > > > I have access to 9' grand pianos.
> > > >
> > > > Mozart didn't have the sound of a 9' concert grand in mind when he
was
> > > > composing.
> > > > He did have access to fortepiani.
> > > >
> > > > As well as pianists can interpret Mozart on a 9', they can NEVER
> > duplicate
> > > > what Mozart had in mind.
> > > >
> > > > my biased 2¢
> > > >
> > > > Conrad
> > > > (just finished tuning two harpsichords...)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > caut list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives
> > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > caut list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> caut list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives
>


This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC