This is a multipart message in MIME format
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
The screw in the dag set the action in the correct spot according=
to the cheek blocks. Once set he didn't have to use the cheek=
blocks. Once done, turning in the dag screw brought the cheek=
blocks back into the equation, i.e. they could be adjusted in=
the future to move the action in....that's my take and I'm=
sticking to it.
David I.
Original message
From: Avery Todd
To: College and University Technicians
Received: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 14:57:47 -0600
Subject: Re: [CAUT] D complimented
Roger,
Some great suggestions. One question though. Why do you turn the=
dag screws in after
voicing. It seems like that would change the strike point where=
you'd been doing the
voicing. What am I missing here?
Avery
At 08:45 PM 3/20/2005, you wrote:
Hi Wim,
I'm happy every thing worked out for you. =3DD>
Some suggestions that may be helpful to you.
I have added Dag screws to the D's I look after. It makes voicing=
a lot easier I can quickly push the action into position, and=
not have to worry about cheek blocks and the sustenuto rod=
giving problems. After voicing, I back the screws inwards a=
quarter of a turn.
I have a couple of pieces of laminated card, so I can depress the=
pedal, and slip it at the bass end of the action. This will=
give an accurate half pedal position, makes it easy to get=
consistent voicing in this position. The thickness of the card=
is half the thickness of the Agraffe holes.
To get good contrast at half pedal, using the string marks on the=
hammer for a guide. Chop stick needling tool, (single needle) =
Insert needle 1-1.5mm directly into crown, vertical to molding,=
and dead centre of string marks. I find it faster to reverse=
the action into the action cavity. It is also more accurate,=
than leaning over a larger concert grand action.
Check half peddle voicing with card inserted at bass end. Chalk=
mark the keys that require corrective action. I like to run=
Chromatic scales at both pp and ff. Checking for evenness.
Regards Roger
At 04:34 PM 3/20/2005, you wrote:
Today was the faculty recital on the D I've been discussing, and=
the results were very favorable.
This morning I spent an hour and half tuning and spot voicing the=
piano, and at 1 PM met with the professor, where he pointed out=
a few minor shift voicing problems. He did say he wished there=
was a little more power in the 5th octave, but I pointed out=
that it might make the piano too brittle. And besides, he didn't=
want any changes at this point.
After the recital he looked very pleased, and thanked me for the=
work on the piano. This, for me, was a big relief. I had been=
uptight about this for several weeks. (Ask my wife. She's been a=
saint for putting up with me).
Not only was the professor happy, guess who also showed up? The=
critic who slammed my piano three weeks ago. Actually, he is a=
good friend of mine, and I've worked on his piano. At=
intermission we talked, and he said he thought the piano sounded=
great.
So, the bottom line, at least for now, is that the professor is=
happy, the critic is happy, and that makes me happy. (I haven't=
heard from the other piano professor, but I'll worry about that=
some other time).
Wim
Willem Blees, RPT
Piano Technician
School of Music
University of Alabama
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/caut.php/attachments/2a/b8/84/0e/attachment.htm
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC