[CAUT] balancier/wippens report

[David Skolnik]

At 10:19 AM 12/19/2006, I wrote:
>TwoTims -
>
>Also, one minor correction, which if uncorrected becomes major.
>
>>The shank at rest should dissect the backcheck at the line,,,
>
>I would say that definitely comes under the heading of "what 
>not".  If the shank can do that at rest, just think what it can do 
>when it's moving!!   Witness the birth of a whole new piano based horror genre.


Sorry, I was just so pleased with myself that I couldn't bear the 
thought that the above might have hurtled unobserved into the black 
hole of the archives.  Tims one and two of course meant bisect, not 
dissect.  The possibilities just fascinated me.

David Skolnik