"belligerent" prose (well, maybe the 'pigeon poo' was a little testy)! On the other hand, have you ever heard a statue complain?! ..... Best just wear a hat & keep walkin'! ----- Original Message ----- From: "RicB" <ricb at pianostemmer.no> To: <caut at ptg.org> Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 1:19 PM Subject: [CAUT] WAPIN Installation > Dave, Tim... others. > > I'm not sure I agree with the statement that there hasnt been any posts > that could not very understandably be seen as belligerent in tone, or > borderline. Given the history of some of the exchanges on this subject > I'd think everyone should go out of their way to stay on very safe and > very polite ground. It is far to easy as it is to read between the > lines. Especially when one has been stung outright in the past. > > That said... I'd agree with David in that whatever testing has been done > should be made public and available to anyone that wants to check it > out. One of Stuarts & Sons problems is that they leave themselves open > to this kind of questioning.. which indeed crosses the border into > attack on occasion. > > One other point I'd like to make. True enough... a patent holder must > defend the claims made. But not beyond what is reasonable. Any > counter-claim about the claims made must be just as credible in basis. > But that is the extent of a patent holders responsiblities in this > regard. Strictly speaking... questions in themselves dont qualify as > demanding an answer... tho perhaps it is wiser to meet the questioning > community then ignore it. > > Cheers > RicB > > > > Tim: > > I know posts from me have irritated you in the past so I'll try my > bestnot to do that with this one. > > When someone invents something that they deem to be significant, > application is made for a patent. In the patent process "claims" > are made. If the patent office decides that these claims are novel, > not obvious, and not "prior art" a patent is awarded. At that time > the claims are made public and the intellectual property is > protected for a length of time. > > At this point outsiders can evaluate the claims in the patent and > question them. The inventor/patent-holder must then defend their > claims. Once a patent has been made public the inventor can expect > questions from the relevant community about his/her work. The old > playground "because I said so" doesn't suffice. Questions, requests > for scientific (repeatable) test results can certainly be expected. > Even the testing process is open to discussion as to its validity. > This back-and-forth between knowledgeable people is what keeps > innovation moving. That's all I've seen here in this discussion. I > haven't seen any "belligerent" prose (well, maybe the 'pigeon poo' > was a little testy)! > > As you know I spent two days with you learning the process and paid > my $100 to become a licensed Wapin installer. I'm interested in > _anything_ > that can improve our chosen instrument. That doesn't mean that I > don't still have questions. Like most in our line of work I always > want to know how and why something works. These are questions, not > attacks! > > dave > > David M. Porritt > dporritt at smu.edu > > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.13.29/520 - Release Date: 11/6/2006 > >
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC