OK, I'll take your word for it. I guess the next question is, who cares?
Inharmonicity in this section a few points to this side or that side doesn't
really seem like anything of any significance when compared with stability
(resistance to wear) and propensity for leakage (buzzing).
David Love
davidlovepianos at comcast.net
www.davidlovepianos.com
-----Original Message-----
From: caut-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:caut-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf Of RicB
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 8:50 AM
To: caut at ptg.org
Subject: [CAUT] Duplex
You have it backwards.
The sharper termination allows the string to pivot. I posted an except
on all this from Ed's book on this a while back. Its in the archives.
There isnt a lot of guesswork involved here, and the lower inharmonicity
is not a goal in-itself... its just one of the results of the sharp
termination.
RicB
So what you're saying is that a less sharp termination allows the
string to
pivot and, in effect, influences the stiffness factor of the wire.
I would
think that as long as the situation was stable that the measureable
difference would be small, the audible difference probably
insignificant. A
more rounded or flatter and wider termination also has the potential of
creating an oscillating string length which might have a greater
negative
impact, i.e. falseness. It would be my guess that as long as the
termination was stable, that is not oscillating to the point of
falsenss,
that any increase in inharmonicity due to the ability of the string
to pivot
would be relatively insignificant, meaning even if you could measure
it, in
practice you probably couldn't hear it. For me, the importance of
the shape
is to avoid falseness, leakage and produce long term stability. These
issues I would rate as much more important than any inaudible
differences in
inharmonicity.
David Love
davidlovepianos at comcast.net
www.davidlovepianos.com
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC