Hi Jim I know the arguments surrounding all the approaches to the capo pretty well by now. As far as the V vs U thingy is concerned. Of course their are no absolutes in our world :)... but there most definitely are profiles that are far more V like then U like. Mine are very much V like. The reason, as given by McMorrow, is that as they wear they do not become rounded. The grooves that form are very much different then those that form in a thin and very rounded U shape, and yeild different results as far as terminating the string. Again, I advise getting ahold of McMorrows book and reading his perspectives. I find them sound. A very slight buffing of an edge does not really constitute a curvature... at least not enough of one for me to start thinking in terms of radius's and the like. I file (with a flat metal file) sharply off the edges of the capo until I get a 0.5 mm wide <<surface area>>... which I then insure the surface area is flat by filing it so. The amount of surface depth this eventually removes on capos where this procedure is appropriate is not a matter of concern. On instruments with very hard capos, and with counterbearing angles and front lengths that prohibit the << thin and sharp>> approach... I generally go for as thin as I think I can get away with... 1 + mm with a rounded off edge towards the front length and a rather sharp edge towards the speaking length. I just feel its important for as precise as possible determination of the speaking length termination. Ron Overs, thin and hard profile with appropriately designed front lengths and counterbearing angles seems to be reasoned on similar grounds... tho I am sure he will pop in if I am mislead here. In the end tho... to be sure. All roads do sooner or later lead to Rome... but perhaps we are speaking of a different Rome ? :) I quoted McMorrow a few years back on Pianotech where I wrote down some of his stuff from his book. If I get some time in the next few days I'll see if I can dig it up. His book is well worth reading IMHO. Cheers RicB Ric, I couldn't conjure up anything from the archives on the Spurlock tool, but then I'm fairly inept at computer things... I think Fred addressed capo dressing a few years back in his very thorough manner. As I remember here is the gist of it; the v bar can't be too sharp because it will wear/fracture too fast and soon be rounded anyway, but now with string grooves. He also referred to a .5mm contact point and that stuck with me. However, Ted hit the nail on the head by using the word "curvature". Now if there is curvature there must be a radius, arc, diameter, etc. or at least someway to quantify the curve. Ted's method of referring to a drill bit size/radius works for me. Maybe your V looks sharp but is actually the same as I see as a radius at the very point. (Maybe all roads lead to Rome.) Or, maybe if you see my redressed capo you'd say it's a V. It looks like a V, but it actually isn't sharp. In fact, just the rounding of my flesh as I sand it rounds it over to a small radius. The fret file just seems to make everything more uniform and is very fast. Regards, Jim Busby --
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC