Hi Tim, Just to make myself clear, I have the utmost respect for Michael Wathen and for Bill Garlick. And for you, for that matter. Doesn¹t mean we can¹t state opposing opinions. I don¹t think there is anyone out there deciding ³who wins the game.² As I look at it, we each present our own perspective, and we each have the opportunity to learn from others. Maybe some day we¹ll all agree on everything, but I doubt I¹ll live that long (or even long enough for us all to agree on any one thing). Meanwhile, disagreement doesn¹t have to mean all out war <G>. Regards, Fred Sturm University of New Mexico On 8/7/07 9:48 PM, "Tim Coates" <tcoates1 at sio.midco.net> wrote: > Fred, > > I think if you re-read Michael Wathen's comments he attributes this method to > "Garlick". For those who are too young to remember, that would be Bill > Garlick. A person who used to be a very valuable member of the PTG. > > For me, you are wrong about the rapid flick motion. But you can do that if > you want. You know what works best for you. It's nice to have a good > exchange of ideas without one person judging and insisting they have the only > correct answer. > > Tim Coates > > > On Aug 7, 2007, at 7:13 PM, Fred Sturm wrote: > >> I do like Michael Wathen¹s method if it¹s used for finding cheating >> jacks. Very convenient not to have to hold your finger or hand on each >> hammer. And I¹ll suggest that a rapid flick motion rather than a hard press >> is best to find those borderline cases. Fast as you can, but not necessarily >> much force, will find them best. > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/caut.php/attachments/20070808/6dbc81db/attachment.html
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC