You¹re right! My bad! (I¹ve had my coffee now. I¹ll be OK the rest of the day.) They¹re both nice pianos in their own right, and I wouldn¹t turn either one of them down as a gift. But still, the RX2 is in the 5¹7² neighborhood. If the C5 isn¹t worn out, bigger is better. Ken Z. On 1/17/07 9:03 AM, "Porritt, David" <dporritt at mail.smu.edu> wrote: > Ken, the C5 is only 6¹5² I think. > > dp > > > David M. Porritt > dporritt at smu.edu > > > From: caut-bounces at ptg.org [mailto:caut-bounces at ptg.org] On Behalf Of Ken > Zahringer > Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 8:39 AM > To: College and University Technicians > Subject: Re: [CAUT] comparison > > The RX2 is a nice little piano; I¹ve worked on several of them for the Mormons > around here. BUT - a 7-foot Yamaha for about the same price? And only 17 > years old? Go for the big one! > > Regards, > Ken Z. > > > On 1/16/07 8:31 PM, "David Ilvedson" <ilvey at sbcglobal.net> wrote: > List, > > I have a customer looking at a 1990 Yamaha C5 (apparently little used..I will > inspect) and a new RX2. For about the same price. Any input on your > preference? > > David Ilvedson, RPT > Pacifica, CA 94044 -- Ken Zahringer, RPT Piano Technician MU School of Music 297 Fine Arts 882-1202 cell 489-7529 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/caut.php/attachments/20070117/67faa8ba/attachment.html
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC