Hi folks
Had to respond to a couple things in the back and forth between Fred and
Ron.
First... strikes me that most of the discussion about what constitutes
"significant" in terms of metal creep is because Fred and Ron are
talking past each other. Ron speaks from an engineering perspective...
what formulas tell us etc etc. Where as Fred is comming directly from
the perspective of what happens to metal piano wire. And I agree with
Fred here... the <<significance>> factor of metal wire in the two
perspectives can very easily be two very different things. To put it
this way... are the engineers who design suspension bridges going to
take the kind of elongation it takes to cause a 50 cent change in pitch
in the piano wire application of steel cable as significant for their
purposes ?.... an open question that I think Fred is correct in raising
and has not been directly addressed in reply yet as far as I can see.
As to the below bit... I would say to Ron, that while I agree entirely
with him on this issue of soundboard vertical rise and fall... (for that
matter I'd go further and discount bridge dimension in the vertical
direction changes as unlikely too... due to the amount of increased down
bearing even a 1 mm change causes... this despite the interesting point
of the length change of the string segment on the surface such a rise
would result in because of the bridge pin angles.) ,,, In anycase...
this is not something that is <<determined>> conclusively. There are
just those of us who think along these lines and have presented some
fairly weighty evidence to support the view. But when this discussion
last came up there were many who disagreed and stated outright that
vertical rise and fall of the soundboard does indeed significantly
effect pitch.
Cheers
RicB
>I do know that new strings drop in pitch over time on old
> instruments with zero to negative bearing, in my experience
(meaning wood
> crushing probably wasn't a significant factor there).
Wait a minute. We did this already. Why would wood crushing
not be a factor with negative bearing? Hasn't it already been
determined fairly reasonably that soundboard rise, or fall,
isn't a significant (there's that word again - not absolute or
exclusive, even if measurable) factor in pitch change? Isn't
there still lateral pressure on bridge pins? Isn't there still
longitudinal pressure on tuning pins? Haven't we all seen
bridge pins that had been pushed back by string pressure
enough to produce a visible gap between the pin and the side
of the hole? Haven't we all seen in removed pinblocks how
deeply indented the block is where the edge of the plate
flange sat, and how detailed an impression of the plate
irregularities is pressed into the surface? Haven't we seen
tuning pins (lots of them) that had a very noticeable gap
behind them where string tension through the years pulled them
toward the hitch pins? How is that not wood crush, and how
could that not be a very *major* factor in long term pitch drop?
Be a skeptic, by all means, but hopefully with an eye toward
accumulating better data, rather than discounting obvious
evidence that doesn't fit the preconception.
Just an observation of evidence needing processing.
Ron N
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/caut.php/attachments/20070607/c14c6fd7/attachment.html
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC