On Nov 1, 2007, at 5:50 PM, Jim Busby wrote: > This one sentence is what I want to comment on “If an RPT/ CAUT is > to be something "more desireable" than an RPT status, then > different standards should be established”. I don’t see the CAUT > credential as something “more desirable” or higher, better than, > etc. It seems to me like it’s just “different”, or “in addition to” > RPT. My understanding of a “CAUT Credential” is that it will help > CAUTs focus on things that non CAUTs may not need. Sounds like a "specialty" to me. CAUTs are "specialists", aren't they? Kent -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/caut.php/attachments/20071101/9d96d6e2/attachment.html
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC