On Nov 5, 2007, at 3:42 PM, Jim Busby wrote: > Hi Jeff, > > > > I was mainly talking about RPT needing a time/experience requirement. You're right. I see that now. Sorry bout that. The hot air was in my head this time. > You’re right about the supply/demand though. You get the best you > can get… That being said even our elusive “CAUT Credential” should > have some kind of time requirement IMO. I can’t see some green tech > getting the credential with only one year in the business. But > today I’m just blowing hot air. Pay me no mind… I agree with that 100% as long as it would push salaries up. If we're not going to somehow push to drive the salaries up with this "credential", then I think schools ought to get green techs for entry level money. This endorsement should work both ways, not just for the school's advantage. Jeff Jeff Tanner, RPT University of South Carolina -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/caut.php/attachments/20071105/31572c0f/attachment.html
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC