Hi
I would like to echo Alan McCoys post. If you know Stanwood protocols
then do a few samples so we can get a better idea of the actions actual
working ratio. Otherwise, aside of doing a perfect regulation and
checking for and eliminating all sources of frictions that are hidden
from a static up and down weight measurement. A classic one of these
are sticky key bushings/pins that have lots of side play. Polish
keypins, and teflon the bushings if they are hanging up on sideplay.
A very quick way of increasing leverage, and very reversable as well..
is to take a strips of flange paper.. say 0.2 mm thick, and insert them
under balance rail punchings along the back edge of the balance rail
pins. This increases the leverage significantly and will effectively
reduce the ratio a fair amount.
Your downweight of 50s and upweights just under 30 indicates a roughly
40-42 gram balance weight at most I would suspect.... not exactly heavy
really. But then BW tells only a small part of the touchweight story of
a given action
Cheers
RicB
Hi List,
I have a customer who wants his 1975 Baldwin 6'8" grand to feel
lighter. It was virtually unused for many years and recently had an
action reconditioning and regulation. It weighed off pretty
reasonable. Downweight averaged low 50's to 50 and upweight averaged
upper 20's to 30. Friction seemed low if anything. There isn't a lot
of lead in the keys, as much as four weights in some of the lower
bass. The hammers have enough "extra" material in the cove to remove
some in an arc shape. I'm wondering if doing only that would result
in enough weight loss to make much difference. Has anyone done this
procedure not in conjunction with leading, etc. and received good
results?
Sorry if you already received this. I tried to send this message
yesterday from a different source computer and don't know if it went
out. :)
Thanks,
--
Jeff Farris
Piano Technician
School of Music
UT Austin
mailto; jfarris at mail.utexas.edu
512-471-0158
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC