Hi Kent, So you believe that Stopper's tuning is substantially different from the 3:1 tuning achieved on Tune Lab that David Porritt describes? What I described wasn't a lot of calculations, it was simply a means to create a tuning "on the fly." It actually involved very little calculation - mostly raw measurement and simple addition and subtraction. I frankly don't think dividing a 12th evenly into 19 is significantly different from dividing an octave evenly into 12. Not different at all if the octaves are equal. I suppose you will say the proof is in the pudding. And, though your files sounded fine to my ear, they certainly didn't blow me away. The match between the two pianos was quite good, certainly. Why? Well, I think that any tuning system based on the 3rd partial will markedly reduce the differences, for the simple reason that you are "staying within close range." 3rd partials vary much less than higher partials. Inharmonicity is logarithmic in nature. You could get a better match with a tuning based on 2nd partials, and the very best based on 1st partials. So, fine, the VTD is good at creating acceptable tunings that will make pianos of varying inharmonicity match. That's all to the good, if that is a problem you face. You face it with your Bosey. I have two Ds on my stage, so it is very rarely an issue for me. I am more interested in a tuning that, to my ear, sets off the individual pianos to their best effect. And I think that a tuning based on higher partial matches (whether done electronically/mathematically or aurally) does that better. Of course, all this is very subtle compared to the primacy of unisons and stability. Which is where the art and craft of tuning really lies. The rest is really quite variable, both stretch and temperament, though we spend so much time and energy arguing about stretch and temperament and trying to develop our own skills in those areas. Ironic, no? Regards, Fred Sturm University of New Mexico fssturm at unm.edu On Oct 1, 2008, at 5:52 PM, Kent Swafford wrote: > > On Oct 1, 2008, at 3:59 PM, Fred Sturm wrote: > >> I'm afraid statements ... make me very, very skeptical and wary. > > Of course. Likewise, I am sure. > > >> Personally, I don't believe in magic. > > New technology is indistinguishable from magic, and I do believe > that new technology comes along from time to time. > > > Your spreadsheet construction is very interesting, but it would not, > after all of those calculations, match two pianos that differ wildly > in inharmonicity. Or, if you say it would, I await the audio > files. 8^) > > No one said that 19 tone to the perfect twelfth equal temperament is > new. (Although Stopper does claim to have been among the first to > publish it many years ago.) Stopper's approach to realizing the > tuning across a whole piano scale and indeed across a wide variety > of differing piano scales in such a way as to produce a > characteristic and pleasing synchronous effect, however, does appear > to be new. > > > > Kent > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/caut.php/attachments/20081001/62fe0fad/attachment.html
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC