Excellent observations Kent.
There is one problem with Stoppers situation. His mathematical
treatise is most certainly original in every way. But the general
observance of P-12th tuning most definitely predates him. So any claims
he makes on the rights to use a perfect 12th tuning are questionable at
best. He can however sell his machine and hold rights to the programming
behind it... and for my part more power to him. I admire his efforts
and work in the area for what its worth.
I have had a chance to compare the Tunelab P-12th tuning I worked out
independently on one occasion with a Stopper generated P-12th tuning,
and found that the same basic tendencies are present in both. The
P-12th priority does indeed create a character all its own.... as does
just about any stretch priority.
Cheers
RicB
Fred, your post is thoroughly reasonable.
I have been trying to understand Stopper for almost 2 years now.
There are some obstacles. First there are language and cultural
barriers. And second,
there is the simple fact that Stopper is trying to make money from
his discoveries; his vagueness may not be a matter of not "grasping
the complexities" as much as they are simply wishing to keep the
knowledge proprietary.
But make no mistake, Stopper's credentials are solid, and in 4
months of intensive use of PureTuner (my nickname for Tunic
OnlyPure) I have only been able to corroborate his claims, not
refute them.
Kent
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC